The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
A novel test system for the detection of mutagenic and recombinogenic activity of chemicals is described in detail. Drosophila melanogaster larvae trans‐heterozygous for the mutations multiple wing hairs (mwh) and flare (fir) are exposed to the test compounds for various periods of time ranging from 96 hr to 1 hr. Induced mutations are detected as single mosaic spots on the wing blade of surviving adults that show either the multiple wing hairs or flare phenotype. Induced recombination leads to mwh and fir twin spots and also to a certain extent, to mwh single spots. Recording of the frequency and the size of the different spots allows for a quantitative determination of the mutagenic and recombinogenic effects. This and earlier studies with a small set of well‐known mutagens indicate that the test detects monofunctional and polyfunctional alkylating agents (ethyl methanesulfonate, diepoxybutane, mitomycin C, Trenimon), mutagens forming large adducts (aflatoxin B 1), DNA breaking agents (bleomycin), intercalating agents (5‐aminoacridine, ICR‐170), spindle poisons (vinblastine), and antimetabolites (methotrexate). In addition, the test detects mutagens unstable in aqueous solution β‐propiolactone), gaseous mutagens (1,2‐dibromoethane), as well as promutagens needing various pathways of metabolic activation (aflatoxin B 1, diethylnitrosamine, dimethylnitrosamine, mitomycin C, and procarbazine). The rapidity and ease of performance as well as the low costs of the test necessitate a high priority for validation of this promising Drosophila short‐term test.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718
Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster.
Lindsley, D. L., & Grell, E. H. (1968) · Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10755360 · Cited by 2,603
The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila
(1976) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1976.60 · Cited by 1,611
Cairns, J. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/289353a0 · Cited by 642
Sachs, L. (1974) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05749-0 · Cited by 554
Parameters of the wing imaginal disc development ofDrosophila melanogaster
Garcia-Bellido, A., & Merriam, J. R. (1971) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(71)90047-9 · Cited by 367
Zimmermann, F. K., Kern, R., & Rasenberger, H. (1975) · Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(75)90232-8 · Cited by 361
Developmental compartmentalization in the dorsal mesothoracic disc of Drosophila
Garcia-Bellido, A., Ripoll, P., & Morata, G. (1976) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(76)90052-x · Cited by 341
Biochemistry and Physiology of Microtubules
Snyder, J. A., & McIntosh, J. R. (1976) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.003411 · Cited by 328
Roscoe, J. T., & Byars, J. A. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482341 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Graf, U., Würgler, F. E., Katz, A. J., Frei, H., Juon, H., Hall, C. B., & Kale, P. G.
- Venue
- Environmental Mutagenesis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-188
- ISSN
- 0192-2521 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-238X
- OpenAlex
- W2126041423
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/em.2860060206
- The paper
- Graf, U., Würgler, F. E., Katz, A. J., Frei, H., Juon, H., Hall, C. B., & Kale, P. G. (1984). Somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster. Environmental Mutagenesis. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2860060206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.