EMBO Press – a new way to publish
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EMBO Journal has instituted a manual screening process for aberrant images.
“EMBO Journal, which was not part of the present study, has also instituted a manual screening process for aberrant images (18).”
From The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
The “Prepublication data integrity checks” section says the journal systematically checked all figures in manuscripts poised for acceptance and found image and data-processing problems. This supports screening for aberrant images, but the passage does not specify that the checks were manual. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGreater scrutiny by journals, such as image screening, can reduce the prevalence of problematic images.
“Our findings are consistent with the notion that greater scrutiny by journals can reduce the prevalence of problematic images.”
From The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 44
- Authors
- Pulverer, B.
- Affiliations
- European Molecular Biology Organization (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pulverer, Bernd
- ORCID
- Pulverer, Bernd
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-2
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2075
- PMC
- PMC3990676
- OpenAlex
- W1976358470
- Semantic Scholar
- 4269a8857fd0a6ac3d2265005d5bbf6e29127f2b
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Keywords
- scholarly publishing, open access publishing, research dissemination
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Periodicals as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
