Cited by 58Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPhosphodiesterase function and regulation

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase‐4 promotes oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation and enhances CNS remyelination

Open access
Syed, Yasir A., Baer, Alexandra, Hofer, Matthias P., González, Ginez A., Rundle, Jon, Myrta, Szymon, Huang, Jeffrey K., Zhao, Chao +5 more·2013·EMBO Molecular Medicine

Abstract

The increasing effectiveness of new disease‐modifying drugs that suppress disease activity in multiple sclerosis has opened up opportunities for regenerative medicines that enhance remyelination and potentially slow disease progression. Although several new targets for therapeutic enhancement of remyelination have emerged, few lend themselves readily to conventional drug development. Here, we used transcription profiling to identify mitogen‐activated protein kinase (Mapk) signalling as an important regulator involved in the differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs) into oligodendrocytes. We show in tissue culture that activation of Mapk signalling by elevation of intracellular levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) using administration of either dibutyryl‐cAMP or inhibitors of the cAMP‐hydrolysing enzyme phosphodiesterase‐4 (Pde4) enhances OPC differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate that systemic delivery of a Pde4 inhibitor leads to enhanced differentiation of OPCs within focal areas of toxin‐induced demyelination and a consequent acceleration of remyelination. These data reveal a novel approach to therapeutic enhancement of remyelination amenable to pharmacological intervention and hence with significant potential for translation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/emmm.201303123

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In PBS-treated animals, inclusion of lesions smaller than 0.2 mm2, which were strongly populated with Plp-positive cells, resulted in a significant non-zero slope indicating an effect of lesion size on Plp-positive cell density.

    “The inclusion of lesions smaller than 0.2 mm2, which were strongly populated with Plp-positive cells, resulted in a significant non-zero slope indicating an effect of the lesion size on the cell density, as shown in previous studies14.”

    From Tamoxifen accelerates the repair of demyelinated lesions in the central nervous system (2016) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Methods section (Induction of focal demyelination; page not provided) reports the analysis in PBS-treated animals and a significant non-zero slope for Plp-positive cell density. It gives the lesion-size cutoff as <0.4 mm², however, not <0.2 mm². (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 58

Authors
Syed, Y. A., Baer, A., Hofer, M. P., González, G. A., Rundle, J., Myrta, S., Huang, J. K., Zhao, C., Rossner, M. J., Trotter, M. W. B., Lubec, G., Franklin, R. J. M., & Kotter, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Franklin, Robin J. M.
  • Kotter, Mark R.
Venue
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
5
Issue
12
Pages
1918-1934
ISSN
  • 1757-4676 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-4684
OpenAlex
W2163474372
Cited by
58
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EMBO Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wings for Life
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • BMBF (01ES0812)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phosphodiesterase function and regulation
Keywords
phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, oligodendrocyte differentiation, remyelination, multiple sclerosis, MAPK signaling, cyclic AMP, demyelination, disease-modifying drugs, regenerative medicine
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Central Nervous System, Bucladesine, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Sheath, Oligodendroglia, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Rats, Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases, Type 4, Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review