Estimating common trends in multivariate time series using dynamic factor analysis
Abstract
This article discusses dynamic factor analysis, a technique for estimating common trends in multivariate time series. Unlike more common time series techniques such as spectral analysis and ARIMA models, dynamic factor analysis can analyse short, non‐stationary time series containing missing values. Typically, the parameters in dynamic factor analysis are estimated by direct optimization, which means that only small data sets can be analysed if computing time is not to become prohibitively long and the chances of obtaining sub‐optimal estimates are to be avoided. This article shows how the parameters of dynamic factor analysis can be estimated using the EM algorithm, allowing larger data sets to be analysed. The technique is illustrated on a marine environmental data set. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DFA is a multivariate time series method that seeks to explain the variance in n time series with a linear combination of m hidden random walks where n >> m.
“DFA is a multivariate time series method that seeks to explain the variance in n time series with a linear combination of m hidden random walks where n >> m [15].”
From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Causes and Consequences of Compensatory Dynamics in Ecological Communities
Gonzalez, A., & Loreau, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173349 · Cited by 537 · see citing works
Real time transit demand prediction capturing station interactions and impact of special events
Noursalehi, P., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.023 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Goertler, P. A. L., Scheuerell, M. D., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162121 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zuur, A. F., Fryer, R. J., Jolliffe, I. T., Dekker, R., & Beukema, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Fisheries Research Services (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Zuur, A. F.
- Venue
- Environmetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 665-685
- ISSN
- 1099-095X (ISSN-L)
- 1180-4009
- OpenAlex
- W1996294333
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmetrics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Keywords
- dynamic factor analysis, common trends, multivariate time series, expectation-maximization algorithm, parameter estimation, non-stationary time series, missing data, oceanographic data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review