The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers
Abstract
Compositional data (almost all data in geochemistry) are closed data, that is they usually sum up to a constant (e.g. weight percent, wt.%) and carry only relative information. Thus, the covariance structure of compositional data is strongly biased and results of many multivariate techniques become doubtful without a proper transformation of the data. The centred logratio transformation (clr) is often used to open closed data. However the transformed data do not have full rank following a logratio transformation and cannot be used for robust multivariate techniques like principal component analysis (PCA). Here we propose to use the isometric logratio transformation (ilr) instead. However, the ilr transformation has the disadvantage that the resulting new variables are no longer directly interpretable in terms of the originally entered variables. Here we propose a technique how the resulting scores and loadings of a robust PCA on ilr transformed data can be back‐transformed and interpreted. The procedure is demonstrated using a real data set from regional geochemistry and compared to results from non‐transformed and non‐robust versions of PCA. It turns out that the procedure using ilr‐transformed data and robust PCA delivers superior results to all other approaches. The examples demonstrate that due to the compositional nature of geochemical data PCA should not be carried out without an appropriate transformation. Furthermore a robust approach is preferable if the dataset contains outliers. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Aitchison, J. (1986) · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4109-0 · Cited by 4,383
Cited by
Deep learning and its application in geochemical mapping
Zuo, R., Xiong, Y., Wang, J., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2019) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.02.023 · Cited by 426
Reimann, C., Filzmoser, P., Fabian, K., Hron, K., Birke, M., Demetriades, A., Dinelli, E., & Ladenberger, A. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.032 · Cited by 262
Self-citationSedimentary chemofacies characterization by means of multivariate analysis
Montero-Serrano, J. C., Palarea-Albaladejo, J., Martín-Fernández, J. A., Martínez-Santana, M., & Gutiérrez-Martín, J. V. (2010) · Sedimentary Geology · doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.04.013 · Cited by 64
Poulsen, C. S., Ekstrøm, C. T., Aarestrup, F. M., & Pamp, S. J. (2022) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.00090-22 · Cited by 50
Ghosh, D., Routh, J., Dario, M., & Bhadury, P. (2015) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2015.05.007 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., & Reimann, C.
- Venue
- Environmetrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 621-632
- ISSN
- 1099-095X (ISSN-L)
- 1180-4009
- OpenAlex
- W2013624176
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/env.966
- The paper
- Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., & Reimann, C. (2009). Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. Environmetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.