Process design, economic evaluation and life cycle assessment of jet fuel production from sugar cane residue
Open accessAbstract
With the aim of diversifying energy supplies and mitigating the environmental impacts of the aviation sector, production of renewable jet fuels has recently received substantial attention. To this direction, this study deals with the techno‐economic design and life cycle assessment (LCA) of biojet fuel (farnesane) production from bagasse. Bagasse is the solid residue of sugar industries and its utilization within the biorefinery concept can positively contribute to the sustainable production of fuels. To this end, the present research proposes the production of farnesane from bagasse rather than edible feedstocks (e.g. sugarcane). Mass and energy balances were executed in SuperPro Designer software. The resultant mass yield was equal to 0.121 kg (jet fuel)/kg (dry bagasse) and an energy efficiency of 26.5% can be realized. Economic analysis suggested a gate price of 2.78 $/L. Cradle to grave GHG emissions reductions comparative to fossil jet fuel can be approximately 47%. Overall, the current sustainability analysis explores potential economics and environmental benefits for the lignocellulosic sugars pathway to biojet fuel. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 1227–1235, 2018
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bioethanol from sugarcane had greater environmental impact in terms of HOFP, EOFP, and TAP than agave.
“The higher amount of NOx given off and greater consumption of these feedstocks (i.e., coal, pesticides, and fertilizer) in sugarcane meant that bioethanol from this raw material had a greater environmental impact in terms of HOFP, EOFP, and TAP than agave (Figure 6 and Table 8)”
From Environmental and economic analysis of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses and agave juice (2021) · cites this paper as Michailos 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Michailos, S.
- Affiliations
- Aston University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Michailos, Stavros
- ORCID
- Michailos, Stavros
- Venue
- Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-22
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1227-1235
- ISSN
- 1944-7442 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7450
- OpenAlex
- W2781241847
- Semantic Scholar
- 41998df5f374a3a1a82841d026dacb7d9e309721
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Keywords
- biojet fuel, farnesane, sugarcane bagasse, sugarcane waste, lignocellulosic sugars, biorefinery, process design, techno-economic analysis, life cycle assessment, greenhouse gas emissions, aviation fuel, energy efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review