The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: Review and recommendations
Abstract
The literature of studies which used a combination of chemical and biological degradation (usually oxidative) of organic contaminants in water is reviewed. Beneficial effects of such two‐step treatments are commonly reported; these results, primarily from laboratory studies, suggest potential advantages for water treatment via process integration rather than single technology processing. Four wastewater contaminant types are identified which can benefit from combined processes: 1.) recalcitrant compounds 2.) biodegradable wastes with small amounts of recalcitrant compounds 3.) inhibitory compounds and 4.) intermediate dead‐end products. The design key for such two‐step systems lies in choosing processes that complement each other and lead to a synergistic effect. Predicting this performance outcome requires knowledge of the physical, chemical and biological properties of the major reaction intermediates and their susceptibility to degradation by each process. Economic, physical and technological limitations of the individual processes should be recognized for design of more effective and economical integrated processes. The ultimate treatment goal, whether specific pollutant removal or reduction of a global parameter such as TOC, must be known so that appropriate and complementary processes can be utilized. More work is needed concerning the degradation kinetics within the combined process, from initial attack of the primary compound through dynamics of intermediates and on to total mineralization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buxton, G. V., Greenstock, C. L., Helman, W. P., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555805 · Cited by 12,332
Guillet, J. E., Regulski, T. W., & McAneney, T. B. (1974) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es60095a011 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Decontamination and disinfection of water by solar photocatalysis: Recent overview and trends
Malato, S., Fernández-Ibáñez, P., Maldonado, M. I., Blanco, J., & Gernjak, W. (2009) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,004
Sonochemistry: Environmental Science and Engineering Applications
Adewuyi, Y. G. (2001) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie010096l · Cited by 1,049
Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: A critical review
Trellu, C., Mousset, E., Pechaud, Y., Huguenot, D., van Hullebusch, E. D., Esposito, G., & Oturan, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008 · Cited by 470
Ledakowicz, S., Solecka, M., & Zylla, R. (2001) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1656(01)00296-6 · Cited by 317
Parra, S., Malato, S., & Pulgarin, C. (2002) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/s0926-3373(01)00293-4 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, J. P., & Ollis, D. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Progress
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-103
- ISSN
- 0278-4491 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5921
- OpenAlex
- W2099473319
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: Review and recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ep.670140212
- The paper
- Scott, J. P., & Ollis, D. F. (1995). Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: Review and recommendations. Environmental Progress. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670140212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.