The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe
Open accessAbstract
Most policy process frameworks were developed in the US but are also applied to (Western) Europe. However, policy processes, the relevant actors, and the institutional setting differ substantially. Hence, the question arises if certain concepts that are important in the European context are missing from the frameworks and if the frameworks have been adapted to take these concepts into account. We discuss the three frameworks most widely applied to Europe, the Advocacy Coalition Framework, the Multiple Streams Framework, and the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory, and focus on three concepts that seem particularly relevant in shaping European policy processes, namely political parties, macro‐level institutions, and Europeanization. It turns out that all three frameworks have something to say about all three concepts, although some voids remain. Nonetheless, the adaptations that have been suggested make all three frameworks applicable to European countries and promise substantial explanatory capacity also in these contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- 10.1080/13501763.2016.1215342 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9248.12001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003308201-4 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310275 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11615-022-00400-y · DOI
- Beyme K., 1985, Political parties in Western democracies
- 10.1017/S0143814X2100026X · DOI
- 10.1080/135017600343313 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511778834 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4614-1502-2_9 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501760802684718 · DOI
- Cairney P., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 363
- 10.1111/jcms.12346 · DOI
- 10.1002/epa2.1201 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781009397926 · DOI
- 10.1080/135017600343304 · DOI
- 10.1080/01402382.2024.2328503 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00394.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S0143814X14000166 · DOI
- 10.1111/spsr.12102 · DOI
- 10.1111/psj.12415 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780198842897.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780192847218.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/1475-6765.12089 · DOI · Paper page
- Herweg N., 2016, Decision‐making under ambiguity and time constraints. Assessing the multiple‐streams framework, 125
- 10.1007/s11077-015-9231-z · DOI
- 10.4324/9780429494284-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11615-022-00393-8 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003308201-3 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 · DOI
- Immergut E. M., 1992, Health Politics: Interests and institutions in Western Europe
- 10.1093/jopart/mur035 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780429494284-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Jenkins‐Smith H. C., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 183
- 10.1177/0010414013488536 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x · DOI
- 10.4000/irpp.318 · DOI
- 10.1111/psj.12115 · DOI
- Kingdon J. W., 2011, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (updated second edition)
- 10.1080/1350176032000046912 · DOI
- Klingemann H.‐D., 1994, Parties, policies, and democracy
- 10.4337/9781802209822.00012 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501760110064429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ropr.12283 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0260210515000418 · DOI
- 10.1111/psj.12369 · DOI
- Lijphart A., 1999, Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty‐six countries
- 10.1111/padm.12259 · DOI
- Mai P.2023.Voting against the party line. How career‐related characteristics of members of parliament shape their legislative behaviour. PhD dissertation University of Heidelberg (Accessed 02 August 2024).https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/34027/1/DissertationMaiPhilippUB.pdf.
- 10.1177/0010414011405162 · DOI
- 10.2307/3235165 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003308201-6 · DOI
- 10.2202/1944-4079.1035 · DOI
- Ostrom E., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 267
- Parsons W., 2000, When dogs don't bark, Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 126
- 10.1111/psj.12197 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0143814X07000621 · DOI
- Radaelli C. M., 2000, Public policy comes of age, Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 130
- 10.1111/0952-1895.00122 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781802209822.00025 · DOI
- 10.1080/01442870500126933 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501768880000051 · DOI
- Sabatier P. A., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 117
- Sabatier P. A., 2007, Theories of the policy process, 189
- Sabatier P. A., 1999, Theories of the policy process
- Sabatier P. A., 2014, Theories of the policy process
- Scharpf F. W., 1997, Games real actors play. Actor‐centered institutionalism in policy research
- 10.5771/1610-7780-2010-3-319 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003308201-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/ajps.12313 · DOI
- 10.1080/13501763.2019.1699593 · DOI
- True J. L., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 97
- 10.1515/9781400831456 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00404.x · DOI
- 10.1080/13501760600924035 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781003308201 · DOI
- 10.1111/psj.12360 · DOI
- 10.1177/1354068820919316 · DOI
- 10.3998/mpub.13929 · DOI
- Zahariadis N., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 73
- Zahariadis N., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 25
- 10.17645/pag.v9i3.4102 · DOI
- 10.1080/13876980802648300 · DOI
- Zohlnhöfer R. &Herweg N.(2024).Alive and kicking at 40. From agendas alternatives and public policies to a policy process framework.International Review of Public Policy6(3). · DOI
- 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095428 · DOI
- Zohlnhöfer R., 2016, Decision‐making under ambiguity and time constraints. Assessing the multiple‐streams framework, 169
- 10.1080/07036330500098078 · DOI
- 10.4337/9781800880887.00020 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zohlnhöfer, R., & Herweg, N.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Zohlnhöfer, Reimut
- Venue
- European Policy Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-01-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-229
- ISSN
- 2380-6567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4406252799
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 14.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- European Policy Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- advocacy coalition framework, multiple streams framework, punctuated equilibrium, Europeanization, political parties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/epa2.1236
- The paper
- Zohlnhöfer, R., & Herweg, N. (2025). Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1236