Cited by 9Policy Transfer and LearningEuropean Union Policy and GovernancePublic Policy and Administration Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe

Open access
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Herweg, Nicole·2025·European Policy Analysis

Abstract

Most policy process frameworks were developed in the US but are also applied to (Western) Europe. However, policy processes, the relevant actors, and the institutional setting differ substantially. Hence, the question arises if certain concepts that are important in the European context are missing from the frameworks and if the frameworks have been adapted to take these concepts into account. We discuss the three frameworks most widely applied to Europe, the Advocacy Coalition Framework, the Multiple Streams Framework, and the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory, and focus on three concepts that seem particularly relevant in shaping European policy processes, namely political parties, macro‐level institutions, and Europeanization. It turns out that all three frameworks have something to say about all three concepts, although some voids remain. Nonetheless, the adaptations that have been suggested make all three frameworks applicable to European countries and promise substantial explanatory capacity also in these contexts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/epa2.1236

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 91

  1. 10.1080/13501763.2016.1215342 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/1467-9248.12001 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00389.x · DOI
  4. 10.4324/9781003308201-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310275 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s11615-022-00400-y · DOI
  7. Beyme K., 1985, Political parties in Western democracies
  8. 10.1017/S0143814X2100026X · DOI
  9. 10.1080/135017600343313 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511778834 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-1-4614-1502-2_9 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/13501760802684718 · DOI
  13. Cairney P., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 363
  14. 10.1111/jcms.12346 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/epa2.1201 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/9781009397926 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/135017600343304 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/01402382.2024.2328503 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00394.x · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S0143814X14000166 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/spsr.12102 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/psj.12415 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/oso/9780198842897.001.0001 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/oso/9780192847218.001.0001 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1475-6765.12089 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Herweg N., 2016, Decision‐making under ambiguity and time constraints. Assessing the multiple‐streams framework, 125
  27. 10.1007/s11077-015-9231-z · DOI
  28. 10.4324/9780429494284-2 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11615-022-00393-8 · DOI
  30. 10.4324/9781003308201-3 · DOI
  31. 10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 · DOI
  32. Immergut E. M., 1992, Health Politics: Interests and institutions in Western Europe
  33. 10.1093/jopart/mur035 · DOI
  34. 10.4324/9780429494284-5 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Jenkins‐Smith H. C., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 183
  36. 10.1177/0010414013488536 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00405.x · DOI
  39. 10.4000/irpp.318 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/psj.12115 · DOI
  41. Kingdon J. W., 2011, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (updated second edition)
  42. 10.1080/1350176032000046912 · DOI
  43. Klingemann H.‐D., 1994, Parties, policies, and democracy
  44. 10.4337/9781802209822.00012 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/13501760110064429 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1111/ropr.12283 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/S0260210515000418 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/psj.12369 · DOI
  49. Lijphart A., 1999, Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty‐six countries
  50. 10.1111/padm.12259 · DOI
  51. Mai P.2023.Voting against the party line. How career‐related characteristics of members of parliament shape their legislative behaviour. PhD dissertation University of Heidelberg (Accessed 02 August 2024).https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/34027/1/DissertationMaiPhilippUB.pdf.
  52. 10.1177/0010414011405162 · DOI
  53. 10.2307/3235165 · DOI
  54. 10.4324/9781003308201-6 · DOI
  55. 10.2202/1944-4079.1035 · DOI
  56. Ostrom E., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 267
  57. Parsons W., 2000, When dogs don't bark, Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 126
  58. 10.1111/psj.12197 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004 · DOI
  60. 10.1017/S0143814X07000621 · DOI
  61. Radaelli C. M., 2000, Public policy comes of age, Journal of European Public Policy, 7, 130
  62. 10.1111/0952-1895.00122 · DOI
  63. 10.4337/9781802209822.00025 · DOI
  64. 10.1080/01442870500126933 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/13501768880000051 · DOI
  66. Sabatier P. A., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 117
  67. Sabatier P. A., 2007, Theories of the policy process, 189
  68. Sabatier P. A., 1999, Theories of the policy process
  69. Sabatier P. A., 2014, Theories of the policy process
  70. Scharpf F. W., 1997, Games real actors play. Actor‐centered institutionalism in policy research
  71. 10.5771/1610-7780-2010-3-319 · DOI
  72. 10.4324/9781003308201-8 · DOI
  73. 10.1111/ajps.12313 · DOI
  74. 10.1080/13501763.2019.1699593 · DOI
  75. True J. L., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 97
  76. 10.1515/9781400831456 · DOI
  77. 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00404.x · DOI
  78. 10.1080/13501760600924035 · DOI
  79. 10.4324/9781003308201 · DOI
  80. 10.1111/psj.12360 · DOI
  81. 10.1177/1354068820919316 · DOI
  82. 10.3998/mpub.13929 · DOI
  83. Zahariadis N., 1999, Theories of the policy process, 73
  84. Zahariadis N., 2014, Theories of the policy process, 25
  85. 10.17645/pag.v9i3.4102 · DOI
  86. 10.1080/13876980802648300 · DOI
  87. Zohlnhöfer R. &Herweg N.(2024).Alive and kicking at 40. From agendas alternatives and public policies to a policy process framework.International Review of Public Policy6(3). · DOI
  88. 10.1080/13876988.2015.1095428 · DOI
  89. Zohlnhöfer R., 2016, Decision‐making under ambiguity and time constraints. Assessing the multiple‐streams framework, 169
  90. 10.1080/07036330500098078 · DOI
  91. 10.4337/9781800880887.00020 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zohlnhöfer, R., & Herweg, N.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Zohlnhöfer, Reimut
Venue
European Policy Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-01-09
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
207-229
ISSN
2380-6567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406252799
Cited by
9
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Policy Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Union Policy and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
advocacy coalition framework, multiple streams framework, punctuated equilibrium, Europeanization, political parties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/epa2.1236
The paper
Zohlnhöfer, R., & Herweg, N. (2025). Don't you forget about me! Concepts missing from policy process frameworks when applied to Europe. European Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1236