Cited by 30Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsSeismic Performance and AnalysisStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

LQR control with frequency‐dependent scheduled gain for a semi‐active floor isolation system

Shi, Yundong, Becker, Tracy C., Furukawa, Sachi, Sato, Eiji, Nakashima, Masayoshi·2014·Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Abstract

SUMMARY: Floor isolation is an alternative to base isolation for protecting a specific group of equipment installed on a single floor or room in a fixed‐base structure. The acceleration of the isolated floor should be mitigated to protect the equipment, and the displacement needs to be suppressed, especially under long‐period motions, to save more space for the floor to place equipment. To design floor isolation systems that reduce acceleration and displacement for both short‐period and long‐period motions, semi‐active control with a newly proposed method using the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) control with frequency‐dependent scheduled gain (LQRSG) is adopted. The LQRSG method is developed to account for the frequency characteristics of the input motion. It updates the control gain calculated by the LQR control based on the relationship between the control gain and dominant frequency of the input motion. The dominant frequency is detected in real time using a window method. To verify the effectiveness of the LQRSG method, a series of shake table tests is performed for a semi‐active floor isolation system with rolling pendulum isolators and a magnetic‐rheological damper. The test results show that the LQRSG method is significantly more effective than the LQR control over a range of short‐period and long‐period motions. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eqe.2352

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897) · DOI
  2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1177) · DOI
  3. 10.1002/eqe.1097 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/eqe.2293 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/eqe.2299 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/eqe.2305 · DOI
  7. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000187 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.015 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/eqe.844 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/eqe.2304 · DOI
  11. 10.1193/1.1585828 · DOI
  12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:7(705) · DOI
  13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:9(981) · DOI
  14. 10.1002/stc.104 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1427::AID-EQE876>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  16. 10.1002/eqe.84 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/eqe.2341 · DOI
  18. Zemp R, 2012, Tall building vibration control using a TM‐MR damper assembly, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40, 339, 10.1002/eqe.1033 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/eqe.372 · DOI
  20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:1(135) · DOI
  21. 10.1002/eqe.1120 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/eqe.1040 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/eqe.1162 · DOI
  24. 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/stc.38 · DOI
  26. Kwakernaak H, 1972, Linear Optimal Control Systems
  27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230) · DOI
  28. 10.1002/eqe.2236 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/eqe.2237 · DOI
  30. ShiY SatoE HokiK NakashimaM.Test on hybrid floor isolation system with semi‐active control.Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering/4th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering Tokyo Japan 2012;1459–1464.
  31. Nagarajaiah S, 2006, Smart base‐isolated benchmark building: part II, phase I, sample controller for linear isolation system, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 13, 589
  32. ShiY BeckerTC KurataM NakashimaM.Design of a PI controller for MR dampers using damper force feedback.Proceedings of the First International symposiumon Earthquake Engineering Tokyo Japan 2012;311–316.
  33. Rugh WJ, 2002, Research on gain scheduling, Automatica, 26, 1401
  34. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Shi, Y., Becker, T. C., Furukawa, S., Sato, E., & Nakashima, M.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (JP)
Corresponding author
Shi, Yundong
Venue
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-26
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1265-1284
ISSN
  • 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9845
OpenAlex
W1955355640
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rice University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22246073)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Keywords
semi-active control, linear quadratic regulator, long-period ground motion, short-period ground motion, shaking table test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review