Cited by 53Seismic Performance and AnalysisVibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Response to Dynamic Loads

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design of hysteretic dampers with optimal ductility for the transverse seismic control of cable‐stayed bridges

Open access
Camara, Alfredo, Cristantielli, Roberto, Astiz, Miguel A., Málaga‐Chuquitaype, Christian·2017·Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics

Abstract

Summary: Cable‐stayed bridges require a careful consideration of the lateral force exerted by the deck on the towers under strong earthquakes. This work explores the seismic response of cable‐stayed bridges with yielding metallic dampers composed of triangular plates that connect the deck with the supports in the transverse direction. A design method based on an equivalent single‐degree of freedom approximation is proposed. This is proved valid for conventional cable‐stayed bridges with 200‐ and 400‐m main spans, but not 600 m. The height of the plates is chosen to (1) achieve a yielding capacity that limits the maximum force transmitted from the deck to the towers, and to (2) control the hysteretic energy that the dampers dissipate by defining their design ductility. In order to select the optimal ductility and the damper configuration, a multi‐objective response factor that accounts for the energy dissipation, peak damper displacement and low‐cycle fatigue is introduced. The design method is applied to cable‐stayed bridges with different spans and deck–support connections. The results show that the dissipation by plastic deformation in the dampers prevents significant damage in the towers of the short‐to‐medium‐span bridges under the extreme seismic actions. However, the transverse response of the towers in the bridge with a 600‐m main span is less sensitive to the dampers. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eqe.2884

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. HuangY BerteroVV WadaA.Innovative strategies in earthquake engineering Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance‐Based Engineering.CRC Press:Boca Raton Florida 2004. · DOI
  2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:4(1015) · DOI
  3. 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(272) · DOI
  4. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:6(801) · DOI
  5. PappinJW KiteS.Seismic design of Stonecutters bridge Hong Kong. In14thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering:Beijing (China) 2008.http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_ 07-0183.PDFPaper No. 14_07‐0183.
  6. 10.1007/s11803-015-0049-7 · DOI
  7. 10.2749/101686605777963387 · DOI
  8. InfantiS PapanikolasP BenzoniG CastellanoMG.Rion Antirion bridge; design and full‐scale testing of the seismic protection devices.Proceedings of 13thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering:Vancouver B.C. (Canada) 2004.http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/ article/13_2174.pdfPaper No. 2174.
  9. 10.1193/1.2219107 · DOI
  10. EnomotoM TakanoH OgasawaraM TakahashiW WatanabeN InoueM.Design and study of the Tsurumi Fairway bridge. InCable‐stayed and Suspension Bridges; IABSE / FIP International Conference vol. I:Deauville (France) 1994;429–435.
  11. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000508 · DOI
  12. 10.1155/1995/918721 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/eqe.4290230805 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034 · DOI
  15. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000234 · DOI
  16. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000236 · DOI
  17. BermanJW BruneauM.Development of self‐stabilizing links for eccentrically braced frames Proceedings of 14thWorld Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Beijing (China) 2008.http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_ 05-05-0013.PDFPaper No. 14_05‐05‐0013.
  18. Chang KC, 2004, Lessons learned from the damaged Chi‐Lu cable‐stayed bridge, Journal of Structural Engineering, 9, 343
  19. 10.1002/9781119978237 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/13632469.2010.505275 · DOI
  21. 10.2749/101686614X13830790993762 · DOI
  22. 10.1193/1.1585727 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/9780470172858 · DOI
  24. Soong TT, 1997, Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering
  25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.017 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/13632460601033884 · DOI
  27. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000585 · DOI
  28. AASHTO.Standard specifications for highway bridges 2002. 17th Edition.
  29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345) · DOI
  30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:6(946) · DOI
  31. 10.1193/1.1585644 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/eqe.827 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/eqe.4290050306 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/eqe.2251 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Camara, A., Cristantielli, R., Astiz, M. A., & Málaga‐Chuquitaype, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Civil Engineering, City University of London London UK
  • Polytechnic University of Bari (IT)
  • Department of Mechanics and Structures, School of Civil Engineering Technical University of Madrid Madrid Spain
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-10
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
1811-1833
ISSN
  • 0098-8847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9845
OpenAlex
W2593396831
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Keywords
cable-stayed bridges, hysteretic dampers, transverse seismic response, energy dissipation, low cycle fatigue, equivalent single-degree-of-freedom system, long-span bridges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design of hysteretic dampers with optimal ductility for the transverse seismic control of cable‐stayed bridges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/eqe.2884
The paper
Camara, A., Cristantielli, R., Astiz, M. A., & Málaga‐Chuquitaype, C. (2017). Design of hysteretic dampers with optimal ductility for the transverse seismic control of cable‐stayed bridges. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2884