The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent advances with UNSW vanadium-based redox flow batteries
Abstract
The vanadium redox flow battery pioneered by Skyllas-Kazacos et al. at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) is currently considered as one of the few electrochemical energy storage systems suitable for use in the large-scale utility applications that are emerging in response to the increasing global implementation of renewable energy technologies for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. While the original all-vanadium redox flow battery (G1 VRF) has already been successfully implemented in a wide range of stationary field trials in Japan, U.S.A., Austria, Italy and Australia, further cost reduction has been needed for its widespread market up-take. In this paper, up to 80% efficiency is reported for the latest 5–10 kW G1 VRF battery stack employing low-cost stack materials that are expected to achieve the necessary cost structure for the majority of stationary energy storage applications. While the G1 VRF battery has shown high efficiencies and excellent cycle life, however, its low energy density has restricted its use in mobile applications. The new Generation 2 vanadium bromide redox battery (G2 V/Br) patented by UNSW in 2001 has been shown to potentially double the energy density of the G1 VRF battery, allowing mobile applications to be considered. In this paper, the performance of the G2 V/Br is presented at a range of temperatures and the use of complexing agents is shown to successfully bind any bromine produced during charging to prevent the formation of bromine vapours. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Progress in Flow Battery Research and Development
Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Chakrabarti, M. H., Hajimolana, S. A., Mjalli, F. S., & Saleem, M. (2011) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3599565 · Cited by 1,453
Self-citationElectrolyte Lifetime in Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries: A Critical Review
Kwabi, D. G., Ji, Y., & Aziz, M. J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00599 · Cited by 616
Membrane Development for Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries
Schwenzer, B., Zhang, J., Kim, S., Li, L., Liu, J., & Yang, Z. (2011) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100068 · Cited by 517
Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies
Lu, W., Yuan, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00823b · Cited by 479
Emerging electrochemical energy conversion and storage technologies
Badwal, S. P. S., Giddey, S. S., Munnings, C., Bhatt, A. I., & Hollenkamp, A. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2014.00079 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Kazacos, G., Poon, G., & Verseema, H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2009-11-30
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 182-189
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023863575
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances with UNSW vanadium-based redox flow batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/er.1658
- The paper
- Skyllas-Kazacos, M., Kazacos, G., Poon, G., & Verseema, H. (2010). Recent advances with UNSW vanadium-based redox flow batteries. International Journal of Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.1658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.