The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of the all-vanadium redox flow battery for energy storage: a review of technological, financial and policy aspects
Open accessAbstract
The commercial development and current economic incentives associated with energy storage using redox flow batteries (RFBs) are summarised. The analysis is focused on the all-vanadium system, which is the most studied and widely commercialised RFB. The recent expiry of key patents relating to the electrochemistry of this battery has contributed to significant levels of commercialisation in, for example, Austria, China and Thailand, as well as pilot-scale developments in many countries. The potential benefits of increasing battery-based energy storage for electricity grid load levelling and MW-scale wind/solar photovoltaic-based power generation are now being realised at an increasing level. Commercial systems are being applied to distributed systems utilising kW-scale renewable energy flows. Factors limiting the uptake of all-vanadium (and other) redox flow batteries include a comparatively high overall internal costs of $217 kW−1 h−1 and the high cost of stored electricity of ≈ $0.10 kW−1 h−1. There is also a low-level utility scale acceptance of energy storage solutions and a general lack of battery-specific policy-led incentives, even though the environmental impact of RFBs coupled to renewable energy sources is favourable, especially in comparison to natural gas- and diesel-fuelled spinning reserves. Together with the technological and policy aspects associated with flow batteries, recent attempts to model redox flow batteries are considered. The issues that have been addressed using modelling together with the current and future requirements of modelling are outlined. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328 · cited 1×
“Despite this early activity, modelling of redox flow batteries is not a well‐developed area, particularly in contrast to static batteries [96,97] and fuel cells [98,99].”
Background
Cited by
The Prospect of Hydrogen Storage Using Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers
Modisha, P. M., Ouma, C. N. M., Garidzirai, R., Wasserscheid, P., & Bessarabov, D. (2019) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b00296 · Cited by 638
Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies
Lu, W., Yuan, Z., Zhao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00823b · Cited by 479
Vanadium redox flow batteries: a technology review
Cunha, Á., Martins, J., Rodrigues, N., & Brito, F. P. (2015) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.3260 · Cited by 356
Arenas, L. F., Ponce de León, C., & Walsh, F. C. (2017) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2017.02.007 · Cited by 312
Self-citationKrishan, O., & Suhag, S. (2019) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.4285 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Kear, G., Shah, A. A., & Walsh, F. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-05-24
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1105-1120
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122408573
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.