The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on selected heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production: Review heterogeneous photocatalysts hydrogen production from water
Open accessAbstract
In this study, visible light-driven heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production are comparatively assessed based on technical, environmental, and cost criteria. The photocatalysis systems are compared with respect to their (i) rate of hydrogen generation per gram; (ii) rate of hydrogen generation per m2 of the specific surface area; and (iii) the band gap energy. The photocatalysis systems are also compared and discussed in terms of flammability, reactivity, and their impact on living systems' health. Furthermore, the costs of the required components of the photocatalysis systems are ranked. In addition to individual photocatalyst comparison, seven photocatalyst groups are ranked and compared. The results show that TiO2-C-362 and Ag0.03Mn0.40Cd0.60S show the highest in terms of µmol/h-gcat and µmol/h-m2cat, respectively, and TiO2-C-362 has the highest overall rankings. The Zn/In/S-based photocatalyst groups show the highest hydrogen production rate in terms of µmol/h-gcat and µmol/h-m2cat. Overall, Cd/S/Zn has the highest rankings when cost and health and environmental impact criteria are taken into account. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01269a023 · Cited by 28,156
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Semiconductor-based Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation
Chen, X., Shen, S., Guo, L., & Mao, S. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001645 · Cited by 7,876
Platinum-Based Nanostructured Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Chen, A., & Holt-Hindle, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003902 · Cited by 1,390
Abe, R. (2010) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.003 · Cited by 1,223
Cited by
Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability
Dincer, I., & Acar, C. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035 · Cited by 2,641
Self-citationAcar, C., Dincer, I., & Naterer, G. F. (2016) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.3549 · Cited by 684
Self-citationMetal-free photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution
Rahman, M. Z., Kibria, M. G., & Mullins, C. B. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00313d · Cited by 565
Zhu, C., Liu, C., Fu, Y., Gao, J., Huang, H., Liu, Y., & Kang, Z. (2019) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.096 · Cited by 309
Sustainable hydrogen production through water splitting: a comprehensive review
Safari, S., Esmaeilion, F., Rabanian, A., Jamali, D. H., Negi, S., Hoseinzadeh, S., Sayedin, F., Bhoglla, S. S., Haj Assad, M. E., Das, B., et al. (2024) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-024-04699-y · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Acar, C., Dincer, I., & Zamfirescu, C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Energy Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2014-06-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1903-1920
- ISSN
- 0363-907X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1566791157
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on selected heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production: Review heterogeneous photocatalysts hydrogen production from water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/er.3211
- The paper
- Acar, C., Dincer, I., & Zamfirescu, C. (2014). A review on selected heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production: Review heterogeneous photocatalysts hydrogen production from water. International Journal of Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
