Cited by 48Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The predictive value of the early maladaptive schemas in social situations in anorexia nervosa

Meneguzzo, Paolo, Collantoni, Enrico, Bonello, Elisa, Busetto, Paolo, Tenconi, Elena, Favaro, Angela·2020·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Background: Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) show an impairment in the recognition and expression of emotions, as well as an increased sensitivity to being socially excluded, and rigid maladaptive schemas. The Cyberball paradigm is a virtual ball‐toss game that can simulate social exclusion and inclusion. Our aim is to evaluate how cognitive schemas can influence the perception and the evaluation of the experiences of social inclusion/exclusion. Methods: Thirty‐two AN patients and 34 healthy controls completed a psychological evaluation and were randomly assigned to exclusion or overinclusion paradigm of the Cyberball task. Results: Patients with AN showed a significantly higher level of maladaptive schemas as well as higher sensitivity to being ostracized by peers in comparison with healthy controls. Regression analyses identified specific significant relation between being ostracized and dependence/incompetence, negativity/pessimism, and self‐sacrifice. Discussion: Our findings provide evidence that patients with AN may be ineffective in expressing their mood in exclusive and overinclusive social situations. Specific cognitive/temperamental schemas might play a role in the way people communicate their feelings, and they could be considered targets for psychotherapy interventions to improve social interpretation and emotional recognition/communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2724

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 48

Authors
Meneguzzo, P., Collantoni, E., Bonello, E., Busetto, P., Tenconi, E., & Favaro, A.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Meneguzzo, Paolo
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
318-331
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W3003974858
Cited by
48
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione Emanuela, Luigi e Maria Dalla Vecchia Onlus
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, early maladaptive schemas, social exclusion, ostracism, Cyberball paradigm, overinclusion, emotion recognition, emotional expression, self-sacrifice schema, social cognition, predictive value
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Emotions, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychological Distance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review