Cited by 38Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Accuracy of self‐reported weight and height among women with eating disorders: A replication and extension study

Meyer, Caroline, Arcelus, Jon, Wright, Sarah·2009·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Objective Self-reported height and weight data are commonly reported within eating disorders research, and often used clinically. The aims of this study are to demonstrate the accuracy of self-reported height and weight among a group of women with eating disorders, and to determine whether that accuracy is associated with clinical diagnosis or levels of eating psychopathology. Method Sixty-four female patients (39 diagnosed with Anorexia Nervosa or atypical Anorexia Nervosa and 25 with Bulimia Nervosa or atypical Bulimia Nervosa) were asked to self-report their height and weight. They then completed the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Finally, they were weighed and their height was measured in a standardised manner. Accuracy scores for height and weight were calculated by subtracting their actual weight and height from their self-reports. Results Both diagnostic groups were relatively accurate in self-reporting their height. However, women with Bulimia Nervosa or atypical Bulimia Nervosa significantly underestimated their weight while women with Anorexia Nervosa or atypical Anorexia Nervosa overestimated it. Weight estimation was associated with higher levels of restraint among the Anorexia Nervosa group only. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of obtaining objective height and weight data both within clinical and research settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.950

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 38

Authors
Meyer, C., Arcelus, J., & Wright, S.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Caroline
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-17
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
366-370
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W2067873706
Cited by
38
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
self-reported weight, self-reported height, measurement accuracy, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, atypical eating disorders, eating disorder psychopathology, dietary restraint, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Height, Body Weight, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Self Disclosure, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review