Accuracy of self‐reported weight and height among women with eating disorders: A replication and extension study
Abstract
Objective Self-reported height and weight data are commonly reported within eating disorders research, and often used clinically. The aims of this study are to demonstrate the accuracy of self-reported height and weight among a group of women with eating disorders, and to determine whether that accuracy is associated with clinical diagnosis or levels of eating psychopathology. Method Sixty-four female patients (39 diagnosed with Anorexia Nervosa or atypical Anorexia Nervosa and 25 with Bulimia Nervosa or atypical Bulimia Nervosa) were asked to self-report their height and weight. They then completed the Eating Disorders Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Finally, they were weighed and their height was measured in a standardised manner. Accuracy scores for height and weight were calculated by subtracting their actual weight and height from their self-reports. Results Both diagnostic groups were relatively accurate in self-reporting their height. However, women with Bulimia Nervosa or atypical Bulimia Nervosa significantly underestimated their weight while women with Anorexia Nervosa or atypical Anorexia Nervosa overestimated it. Weight estimation was associated with higher levels of restraint among the Anorexia Nervosa group only. Discussion These findings highlight the importance of obtaining objective height and weight data both within clinical and research settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with anorexia nervosa are very accurate when self-reporting their own weight.
“women with AN are very accurate when self‐reporting their own weight (McCabe, McFarlane, Polivy, & Olmsted, 2001; Meyer, Arcelus, & Wright, 2009).”
From Eating disorders in times of the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 pandemic—Results from an online survey of patients with anorexia nervosa (2020) · cites this paper as Meyer, Arcelus, & Wright, 2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Meyer, C., Arcelus, J., & Wright, S.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Meyer, Caroline
- Venue
- European Eating Disorders Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-17
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 366-370
- ISSN
- 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0968
- OpenAlex
- W2067873706
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- self-reported weight, self-reported height, measurement accuracy, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, atypical eating disorders, eating disorder psychopathology, dietary restraint, women
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Height, Body Weight, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Regression Analysis, Self Disclosure, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review