The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ionic conductivity and ion transport mechanisms of solid‐state lithium‐ion battery electrolytes: A review
Open accessAbstract
This review article deals with the ionic conductivity of solid‐state electrolytes for lithium batteries. It has discussed the mechanisms of ion conduction in ceramics, polymers, and ceramic‐polymer composite electrolytes. In ceramic electrolytes, ion transport is accomplished with mobile point defects in a crystal. Li+ ions migrate mainly via the vacancy mechanism, interstitial mechanism, or interstitial‐substitutional exchange mechanism. In solid polymer electrolytes, Li+ ions are transported mainly via the segment motion, ion hopping (Grotthuss mechanism), or vehicle mechanism (mass diffusion). This study has also introduced various electrolyte materials including perovskite oxides, garnet oxides, sodium superionic conductors, phosphates, sulfides, halides, cross‐linked polymers, block‐copolymers, metal‐organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, as well as ceramic‐polymer composites. In addition, it has highlighted some strategies to improve the ionic conductivity of solid‐state electrolytes, such as doping, defect engineering, microstructure tuning, and interface modification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Fast Lithium Ion Conduction in Garnet‐Type Li7La3Zr2O12
Murugan, R., Thangadurai, V., & Weppner, W. (2007) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200701144 · Cited by 3,250
Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
Croce, F., Appetecchi, G. B., Persi, L., & Scrosati, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28818 · Cited by 3,205
Complexes of alkali metal ions with poly(ethylene oxide)
Fenton, D. E., Parker, J. M., & Wright, P. V. (1973) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-8 · Cited by 2,697
Bachman, J. C., Muy, S., Grimaud, A., Chang, H.-H., Pour, N., Lux, S. F., Paschos, O., Maglia, F., Lupart, S., Lamp, P., et al. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 · Cited by 2,537
Fast Na+-ion transport in skeleton structures
Goodenough, J. B., Hong, H. Y.-P., & Kafalas, J. A. (1976) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/0025-5408(76)90077-5 · Cited by 2,284
Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries
Han, X., Gong, Y., Fu, K., He, X., Hitz, G. T., Dai, J., Pearse, A., Liu, B., Wang, H., Rubloff, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4821 · Cited by 2,025
The Impact of Elastic Deformation on Deposition Kinetics at Lithium/Polymer Interfaces
Monroe, C., & Newman, J. (2005) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1850854 · Cited by 1,701
Recent advances in all-solid-state rechargeable lithium batteries
Sun, C., Liu, J., Gong, Y., Wilkinson, D. P., & Zhang, J. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028 · Cited by 1,688
Chen, R., Li, Q., Yu, X., Chen, L., & Li, H. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268 · Cited by 1,678
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, H., & Wu, N.
- Venue
- Energy Science & Engineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-04-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1643-1671
- ISSN
- 2050-0505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293238043
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 29.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic conductivity and ion transport mechanisms of solid‐state lithium‐ion battery electrolytes: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ese3.1163
- The paper
- Yang, H., & Wu, N. (2022). Ionic conductivity and ion transport mechanisms of solid‐state lithium‐ion battery electrolytes: A review. Energy Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
