Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes

Safran, Elizabeth B., Bierman, Paul R., Aalto, Rolf, Dunne, Thomas, Whipple, Kelin X., Caffee, Marc·2005·Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Abstract

The Bolivian Andes flank one of Earth's major topographic features and dominate sediment input into the Amazon Basin. Millennial‐scale erosion rates and dominant controls on erosion patterns in this range are poorly known. To define these patterns, we present 48 erosion rate estimates, derived from analysis of in situ 10 Be in quartz‐bearing alluvium collected from the Upper Beni River basin. Erosion rates, corrected for the non‐uniform distribution of quartz in the sample basins, range from 0·04 mm a−1 to 1·35 mm a−1 and thus integrate over 10 2–10 4 years. Mean and modal values are 0·42 (standard deviation: 0·29) and 0·2–0·4 mm a−1 respectively, within the range of long‐term average erosion rates in this area derived from apatite fission track thermochronology (0·1–0·6 mm a−1). Hence, our data do not record any significant variation in erosion rate over the last several million years. Mean and modal short‐term erosion rates for the Andes are an order of magnitude lower than rates in the Ganges River headwaters in the High Himalaya and an order of magnitude greater than rates typical of the European Alps. In the Upper Beni River region of the Bolivian Andes, short‐term, basin‐averaged erosion rates correlate with normalized channel steepness index, a metric of relative channel gradient corrected for drainage area. Neither normalized channel steepness index nor basin‐averaged erosion rate shows strong correlation with mean basin hillslope gradient or mean basin local relief because many hillslopes in the Upper Beni River region are at threshold values of slope and local relief. Patterns of normalized channel steepness index appear primarily to reflect tectonic patterns and transient adjustment to those patterns by channel networks. Climate and lithology do not appear to exert first‐order controls on patterns of basin‐averaged erosion rates in the Bolivian Andes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/esp.1259

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Safran, E. B., Bierman, P. R., Aalto, R., Dunne, T., Whipple, K. X., & Caffee, M.
Venue
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1007-1024
ISSN
  • 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9837
OpenAlex
W2113828320
Cited by
260
References
0
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.1259
The paper
Safran, E. B., Bierman, P. R., Aalto, R., Dunne, T., Whipple, K. X., & Caffee, M. (2005). Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.