The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes
Abstract
The Bolivian Andes flank one of Earth's major topographic features and dominate sediment input into the Amazon Basin. Millennial‐scale erosion rates and dominant controls on erosion patterns in this range are poorly known. To define these patterns, we present 48 erosion rate estimates, derived from analysis of in situ 10 Be in quartz‐bearing alluvium collected from the Upper Beni River basin. Erosion rates, corrected for the non‐uniform distribution of quartz in the sample basins, range from 0·04 mm a−1 to 1·35 mm a−1 and thus integrate over 10 2–10 4 years. Mean and modal values are 0·42 (standard deviation: 0·29) and 0·2–0·4 mm a−1 respectively, within the range of long‐term average erosion rates in this area derived from apatite fission track thermochronology (0·1–0·6 mm a−1). Hence, our data do not record any significant variation in erosion rate over the last several million years. Mean and modal short‐term erosion rates for the Andes are an order of magnitude lower than rates in the Ganges River headwaters in the High Himalaya and an order of magnitude greater than rates typical of the European Alps. In the Upper Beni River region of the Bolivian Andes, short‐term, basin‐averaged erosion rates correlate with normalized channel steepness index, a metric of relative channel gradient corrected for drainage area. Neither normalized channel steepness index nor basin‐averaged erosion rate shows strong correlation with mean basin hillslope gradient or mean basin local relief because many hillslopes in the Upper Beni River region are at threshold values of slope and local relief. Patterns of normalized channel steepness index appear primarily to reflect tectonic patterns and transient adjustment to those patterns by channel networks. Climate and lithology do not appear to exert first‐order controls on patterns of basin‐averaged erosion rates in the Bolivian Andes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expression of active tectonics in erosional landscapes
Kirby, E., & Whipple, K. X. (2012) · Journal of Structural Geology · doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.07.009 · Cited by 1,093
Self-citationUnderstanding Earth’s eroding surface with 10Be
Portenga, E. W., & Bierman, P. R. (2011) · GSA Today · doi:10.1130/g111a.1 · Cited by 608
Self-citationLandscape form and millennial erosion rates in the San Gabriel Mountains, CA
DiBiase, R. A., Whipple, K. X., Heimsath, A. M., & Ouimet, W. B. (2010) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2009.10.036 · Cited by 548
Self-citationThe stream power river incision model: evidence, theory and beyond
Lague, D. (2014) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3462 · Cited by 542
Landslide erosion coupled to tectonics and river incision
Larsen, I. J., & Montgomery, D. R. (2012) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo1479 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Safran, E. B., Bierman, P. R., Aalto, R., Dunne, T., Whipple, K. X., & Caffee, M.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1007-1024
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2113828320
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.1259
- The paper
- Safran, E. B., Bierman, P. R., Aalto, R., Dunne, T., Whipple, K. X., & Caffee, M. (2005). Erosion rates driven by channel network incision in the Bolivian Andes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.