The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Erosion and terrace failure due to agricultural land abandonment in a semi‐arid environment
Abstract
Agricultural land abandonment is currently widely spread in Mediterranean countries and a further increase is expected. Previous research has shown that abandoned fields in semi‐arid areas are more vulnerable to gully erosion. The absence of ploughing and slow vegetation recovery cause the formation of soil crusts with low infiltration rates, resulting in increased runoff and gully erosion risk. The objective of our study was to assess the extent and causes of erosion and terrace failure on abandoned fields and to discuss options for mitigation. The study was carried out in the Carcavo basin, a semi‐arid catchment in southeast Spain. At catchment scale all abandoned fields were surveyed and characteristics of each field were described. Additionally we surveyed abandoned and cultivated terraces and used statistical analyses to determine the factors that induce terrace failure. At field scale we constructed a detailed digital elevation model (DEM) for an abandoned terrace field in order to calculate sediment losses since time of abandonment. The results revealed that more than half the abandoned fields had moderate to severe erosion and the statistical analysis showed that these fields had significantly steeper slopes, were terraced and had cereals as previous land use. Factors that increase the risk of terrace failure were land abandonment, steeper terrace slope, loam texture, valley‐bottom position and shrubs on the terrace wall. The reconstructed erosion rate (87 ton ha−1 year−1) confirmed the importance of gully erosion on these abandoned terrace fields. Potential soil and water conservation practices to mitigate soil erosion after abandonment are: (1) maintenance of terrace walls, as a result more water is retained, which increases vegetation cover and consequently decreases erosion. (2) Revegetation with indigenous grass species on spots with concentrated flow, especially near terrace walls. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy
Olesen, J. E., & Bindi, M. (2002) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00004-7 · Cited by 1,469
Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review
Gyssels, G., Poesen, J., Bochet, E., & Li, Y. (2005) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133305pp443ra · Cited by 1,225 · cited 1×
“Gyssels et al. (2005) concluded that for splash and sheet erosion vegetation cover is the most important parameter to control erosion, but for rill and gully erosion the effect of plant roots is at least as important.”
Background
Cited by
The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: a review
García-Ruiz, J. M. (2010) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2010.01.001 · Cited by 753
Metadata
- Authors
- Lesschen, J. P., Cammeraat, L. H., & Nieman, T.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-13
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1574-1584
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2015920640
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.