The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In situ characterization of grain‐scale fluvial morphology using Terrestrial Laser Scanning
Open accessAbstract
The grain‐scale morphology of fluvial sediments is an important control on the character and dynamics of river systems; however current understanding of its role is limited by the difficulties of robustly quantifying field surface morphology. Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) offers a new methodology for the rapid acquisition of high‐resolution and high‐precision surface elevation data from in situ sediments. To date, most environmental and fluvial applications of TLS have focused on large‐scale systems, capturing macroscale morphologies. Application of this new technology at scales necessary to characterize the complexity of grain‐scale fluvial sediments therefore requires a robust assessment of the quality and sources of errors in close‐range TLS data. This paper describes both laboratory and field experiments designed to evaluate close‐range TLS for sedimentological applications and to develop protocols for data acquisition. In the former, controlled experiments comprising high‐resolution scans of white, grey and black planes and a sphere were used to quantify the magnitude and source of three‐dimensional (3D) point errors resulting from a combination of surface geometry, reflectivity effects and inherent instrument precision. Subsequently, a methodology for the collection and processing of grain‐scale TLS data is described through an application to a coarse grained gravel system, the River Feshie (D50 32 to 63 mm). This stepwise strategy incorporates averaging repeat scans and filtering scan artefact and non‐surface points using local 3D search algorithms. The sensitivity of the results to the filter parameter values are assessed by careful internal validation of Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) created from the resulting point cloud data. The transferability of this methodology is assessed through application to a second river, Bury Green Brook, dominated by finer gravel (D50 18 to 33 mm). The factor limiting the resolution of DTMs created from this second dataset was found to be the relative sizes of the laser footprint and smallest grains. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions
Carr, J. C., Beatson, R. K., Cherrie, J. B., Mitchell, T. J., Fright, W. R., McCallum, B. C., & Evans, T. R. (2001) · Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/383259.383266 · Cited by 1,852 · cited 1×
“It is therefore suggested that future work is needed in the development of 3D algorithms for surface interpolation (potentially such as the radial basis function approach, Carr et al., 2001) and for the measurement of properties from such 3D surfaces.”
Background
Cited by
Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets
Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., & Sear, D. A. (2010) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.1886 · Cited by 1,160
Self-citationStructure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography
Smith, M. W., Carrivick, J. L., & Quincey, D. J. (2016) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133315615805 · Cited by 772
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodge, R., Brasington, J., & Richards, K.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04-14
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 954-968
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W2035906824
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.