The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes
Abstract
Stream channel development in forested areas is profoundly influenced by large organic debris (logs, limbs and rootwads greater than 10 cm in diameter) in the channels. In low gradient meandering streams large organic debris enters the channel through bank erosion, mass wasting, blowdown, and collapse of trees due to ice loading. In small streams large organic debris may locally influence channel morphology and sediment transport processes because the stream may not have the competency to redistribute the debris. In larger streams flowing water may move large organic debris, concentrating it into distinct accumulations (debris jams). Organic debris may greatly affect channel form and process by: increasing or decreasing stability of stream banks; influencing development of midchannel bars and short braided reaches; and facilitating, with other favourable circumstances, development of meander cutoffs. In steep gradient mountain streams organic debris may enter the channel by all the processes mentioned for low gradient streams. In addition, considerable debris may also enter the channel by way of debris avalanches or debris torrents. In small to intermediate size mountain streams with steep valley walls and little or no floodplain or flat valley floor, the effects of large organic debris on the fluvial processes and channel form may be very significant. Debris jams may locally accelerate or retard channel bed and bank erosion and/or deposition; create sites for significant sediment storage; and produce a stepped channel profile, herein referred to as ‘organic stepping’, which provides for variable channel morphology and flow conditions. The effect of live or dead trees anchored by rootwads into the stream bank may not only greatly retard bank erosion but also influence channel width and the development of small scour holes along the channel beneath tree roots. Once trees fall into the stream, their influence on the channel form and process may be quite different than when they were defending the banks, and, depending on the size of the debris, size of the stream, and many other factors, their effects range from insignificant to very important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., & Stromberg, J. C. (1997) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313099 · Cited by 6,500
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311607 · Cited by 2,460
Self-citationStream Fish Ecology: A Landscape Perspective
Schlosser, I. J. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311765 · Cited by 844
Pool Spacing in Forest Channels
Montgomery, D. R., Buffington, J. M., Smith, R. D., Schmidt, K. M., & Pess, G. (1995) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/94wr03285 · Cited by 494
Effects of prescribed fire on a Sierra Nevada (California, USA) stream and its riparian zone
Bêche, L. A., Stephens, S. L., & Resh, V. H. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.010 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Keller, E. A., & Swanson, F. J.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 361-380
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 0360-1269
- 1931-8065
- OpenAlex
- W2143175817
- Cited by
- 819
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/esp.3290040406
- The paper
- Keller, E. A., & Swanson, F. J. (1979). Effects of large organic material on channel form and fluvial processes. Earth Surface Processes. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290040406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.