Cited by 50Coastal and Marine DynamicsAeolian processes and effectsGeological formations and processes

Decadal and seasonal development of embryo dunes on an accreting macrotidal beach: North Lincolnshire, UK

Montreuil, Anne‐Lise, Bullard, Joanna E., Chandler, Jim H., Millett, Jon·2013·Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Abstract

Embryo dunes are often ephemeral, but can develop to become established coastal foredunes. In 2001 a patch of embryo dunes 13.11 m 2 appeared on a beach in north Lincolnshire, UK and had expanded to over 3600 m 2 by 2011. The rate of expansion is linked to storm occurrence, where expansion is slowed during years with a higher incidence of storm surges. From July 2009–October 2010 seasonal changes in dune field topography were determined using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data. Vegetation is important in the development of embryo dunes, but can cause errors in TLS data. Tests evaluating the impact of vegetation on the TLS data suggest the minimum elevation value from the TLS point cloud within a 0.05 m grid cell gives a good approximation of the ground surface. Digital elevation models (DEMs) of the dunes constructed using filtered data showed the embryo dunes underwent a classic seasonal cycle of erosion during the winter and accretion during the summer. For example from October 2009 to April 2010 over 375 m 3 of sediment was eroded from the dunes whereas during spring and summer 2010 the dune field gained over 600 m 3 of sand. The overall magnitude of change in dune height and volume from season to season exceeded the errors associated with the construction of the DEM from the TLS data and the vegetation filtering process, which suggests TLS can be useful for documenting topographic change in vegetated dunes. After 10 years, the patch of embryo dunes is still expanding but has not yet merged with more established foredunes to landward. Aeolian process measurements indicate that, at present, the embryo dunes do not prevent sand from reaching the foredunes, however the rate of foredune progradation has slowed concurrently with the expansion of the embryo dune field. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/esp.3432

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Montreuil, A., Bullard, J. E., Chandler, J. H., & Millett, J.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bullard, Joanna E.
Venue
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-13
Volume
38
Issue
15
Pages
1851-1868
ISSN
  • 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9837
OpenAlex
W1500135569
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
Keywords
foredunes, macrotidal beaches, dune accretion, dune erosion, storm surge, terrestrial laser scanning, vegetation filtering, digital elevation model, aeolian sand transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review