Decadal and seasonal development of embryo dunes on an accreting macrotidal beach: North Lincolnshire, UK
Abstract
Embryo dunes are often ephemeral, but can develop to become established coastal foredunes. In 2001 a patch of embryo dunes 13.11 m 2 appeared on a beach in north Lincolnshire, UK and had expanded to over 3600 m 2 by 2011. The rate of expansion is linked to storm occurrence, where expansion is slowed during years with a higher incidence of storm surges. From July 2009–October 2010 seasonal changes in dune field topography were determined using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data. Vegetation is important in the development of embryo dunes, but can cause errors in TLS data. Tests evaluating the impact of vegetation on the TLS data suggest the minimum elevation value from the TLS point cloud within a 0.05 m grid cell gives a good approximation of the ground surface. Digital elevation models (DEMs) of the dunes constructed using filtered data showed the embryo dunes underwent a classic seasonal cycle of erosion during the winter and accretion during the summer. For example from October 2009 to April 2010 over 375 m 3 of sediment was eroded from the dunes whereas during spring and summer 2010 the dune field gained over 600 m 3 of sand. The overall magnitude of change in dune height and volume from season to season exceeded the errors associated with the construction of the DEM from the TLS data and the vegetation filtering process, which suggests TLS can be useful for documenting topographic change in vegetated dunes. After 10 years, the patch of embryo dunes is still expanding but has not yet merged with more established foredunes to landward. Aeolian process measurements indicate that, at present, the embryo dunes do not prevent sand from reaching the foredunes, however the rate of foredune progradation has slowed concurrently with the expansion of the embryo dune field. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The gradual narrowing of the beach can intensify the impact of storms, especially those driven by marine processes during winter, which is a critical factor in vegetation mortality.
“For example, the gradual narrowing of the beach can intensify the impact of storms, especially those driven by marine processes during winter, which is a critical factor in vegetation mortality (Montreuil et al., 2013).”
From Towards integrated management of sandy anthropogenic shores: Developing tools for the exploration of human-natural interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Montreuil et al., 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Montreuil, A., Bullard, J. E., Chandler, J. H., & Millett, J.
- Affiliations
- Loughborough University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bullard, Joanna E.
- Venue
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-06-13
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1851-1868
- ISSN
- 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9837
- OpenAlex
- W1500135569
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Coastal and Marine Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
- Keywords
- foredunes, macrotidal beaches, dune accretion, dune erosion, storm surge, terrestrial laser scanning, vegetation filtering, digital elevation model, aeolian sand transport
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review