Cited by 240Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesSoil erosion and sediment transportTree Root and Stability Studies

Effects of vegetation on flow and sediment transport: comparative analyses and validation of predicting models

Vargas‐Luna, Andrés, Crosato, Alessandra, Uijttewaal, Wim S.J.·2015·Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Abstract

The presence of vegetation modifies flow and sediment transport in alluvial channels and hence the morphological evolution of river systems. Plants increase the local roughness, modify flow patterns and provide additional drag, decreasing the bed‐shear stress and enhancing local sediment deposition. For this, it is important to take into account the presence of vegetation in morphodynamic modelling. Models describing the effects of vegetation on water flow and sediment transport already exist, but comparative analyses and validations on extensive datasets are still lacking. In order to provide practical information for modelling purposes, we analysed the performance of a large number of models on flow resistance, vegetation drag, vertical velocity profiles and bed‐shear stresses in vegetated channels. Their assessments and applicability ranges are derived by comparing their predictions with measured values from a large dataset for different types of submerged and emergent vegetation gathered from the literature. The work includes assessing the performance of the sediment transport capacity formulae of Engelund and Hansen and van Rijn in the case of vegetated beds, as well as the value of the drag coefficient to be used for different types of vegetation and hydraulic conditions. The results provide a unique comparative overview of existing models for the assessment of the effects of vegetation on morphodynamics, highlighting their performances and applicability ranges. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/esp.3633

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vargas‐Luna, A., Crosato, A., & Uijttewaal, W. S. J.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL)
Corresponding author
Vargas‐Luna, Andrés
Venue
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-22
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
157-176
ISSN
  • 0197-9337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9837
OpenAlex
W1586129452
Cited by
240
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Colciencias (Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology) (Generaci�n del bicentenario)
  • Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Tree Root and Stability Studies
Keywords
vegetation effects on flow, sediment transport, alluvial channels, flow resistance, vegetation drag, bed shear stress, vertical velocity profiles, submerged macrophytes, emergent vegetation, Van Rijn formula, sediment transport capacity, drag coefficient, morphodynamic modeling, model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review