Cited by 75Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Atmospheric chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate and ionic perfluoroalkyl acids in 2006 to 2014 in Dalian, China

Liu, Wei, Qin, Hui, Li, Jingwen, Zhang, Qian, Zhang, Huanhuan, Wang, Zaoshi, He, Xin·2017·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

Chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate (Cl-PFESA; trade name F-53B) is an alternative product for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) used in metal plating; little is known about its levels in the environment and its risks. To our knowledge, the present study constitutes the first report of Cl-PFESA in the atmosphere. In 2006 to 2014, C8 Cl-PFESA, along with ionic perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs), was detected in atmospheric particulate matter in Dalian, China. Concentrations of C8 Cl-PFESA increased from 140 pg/m3 in 2007 to 722 pg/m3 in 2014. Levels of 11 (total) ionic PFAAs increased in 2006 to 2008 and decreased afterward, with a range of 35.7 to 860 pg/m3. The PFAAs in the particulate matter were dominated by perfluorocarboxylates, with perfluorooctanoate detected at the highest concentration at a mean level of 71.7 pg/m3, followed by perfluoroheptanoate and perfluorohexanoate. Perfluorosulfonates were detected at lower levels, with mean concentrations of PFOS, perfluorobutanesulfonate, and perfluorohexane sulfonate of 5.73, 1.64, and 1.24 pg/m3, respectively. Back-trajectory analysis suggested that the air mass approaching Dalian during the sampling originated from the northwest, where fluorochemical industry parks and metal plating industries are densely located. No significant correlation was observed between Cl-PFESA and the ionic PFAAs. The relatively high Cl-PFESA concentrations suggested that it possibly contributed largely to the previously reported exposure to undefined organic fluorine compounds, for which further research on emission and environmental risks is needed. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:2581–2586. © 2017 SETAC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.3810

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 75

Authors
Liu, W., Qin, H., Li, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, H., Wang, Z., & He, X.
Affiliations
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Wei
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2017-04-18
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2581-2586
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2606700348
Cited by
75
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81273119)
  • Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B13012)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT16LK17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
F-53B, perfluoroalkyl acids, perfluorooctanoic acid, atmospheric particulate matter, air pollution, backward trajectory analysis, Dalian, organic fluorine compounds
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Caproates, China, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fluorocarbons, Heptanoic Acids, Quality Control, Seasons, Particulate Matter, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review