Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century

Open access
Villeneuve, Daniel L, Garcia-Reyero, Natàlia·2011·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

In the 20th century, predicting ecological risk from the use of certain chemicals relied on testing programs that directly measured adverse outcomes (death, disease, reproductive failure, or developmental dysfunction) using in vivo toxicity tests.Extrapolation from these tests-from one species to another or from controlled laboratory tests to uncontrolled real-world environments-was based on largely conservative assumptions or arbitrary uncertainty factors.The result?Costly, time-consuming, unfocused, and contentious assessments that often failed to inspire public confidence in related regulatory and policy decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.396

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Villeneuve, D. L., & Garcia-Reyero, N.
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2011-01-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2068612915
Cited by
170
References
0
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.396
The paper
Villeneuve, D. L., & Garcia-Reyero, N. (2011). Vision & strategy: Predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.396

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.