The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles and processes for evaluating endocrine disruption in wildlife
Open accessAbstract
Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVolume 15, Issue 8 p. 1253-1254 EditorialFree Access Principles and processes for evaluating endocrine disruption in wildlife R.J. Kendall, R.J. Kendall Director TIWET, Clemson University Pendleton, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorR.L. Dickerson, R.L. Dickerson Section Leader TIWET, Clemson University Pendleton, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author R.J. Kendall, R.J. Kendall Director TIWET, Clemson University Pendleton, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this authorR.L. Dickerson, R.L. Dickerson Section Leader TIWET, Clemson University Pendleton, South CarolinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: August 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620150801Citations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume15, Issue8August 1996Pages 1253-1254 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gray, L. E. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/58.2.350 · Cited by 1,084
Länge, R., Hutchinson, T. H., Croudace, C. P., Siegmund, F., Schweinfurth, H., Hampe, P., Panter, G. H., & Sumpter, J. P. (2001) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620200610 · Cited by 649
Effects of environmental antiandrogens on reproductive development in experimental animals
Gray, L. E. (2001) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/7.3.248 · Cited by 473
Mylchreest, E. (2000) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/55.1.143 · Cited by 451
Ostby, J., Monosson, E., Kelce, W. R., & Gray, L. E. (1999) · Toxicology and Industrial Health · doi:10.1177/074823379901500106 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendall, R. J., & Dickerson, R. L.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-08-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1253-1254
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2159804595
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles and processes for evaluating endocrine disruption in wildlife. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620150801
- The paper
- Kendall, R. J., & Dickerson, R. L. (1996). Principles and processes for evaluating endocrine disruption in wildlife. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620150801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
