Cited by 40Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPesticide Residue Analysis and Safety

LIPID METHODOLOGY AND POLLUTANT NORMALIZATION RELATIONSHIPS FOR NEUTRAL NONPOLAR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS

Randall, Robert C, Young, David R, Lee, Henry, Echols, Scott F·1998·Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract

This work compares the ability of hexane and chloroform with methanol (C/M) to extract lipid, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and p,p′-DDE from white croaker (Geneonus lineatus) muscle tissue. Hexane extracted on average 25% of the lipid and 73% of the PCB congeners that were extracted by C/M. Both solvents extracted similar quantities of p,p′-DDE. Consequently, PCB and p,p′-DDE lipid-normalized concentrations using hexane values were 2.9 and 3.9 times greater than with C/M values, and greater than fivefold differences are possible using hexane lipid values with C/M pollutant values. Because the solvents primarily extract different lipid pools, the results conceivably approximate the largest lipid-normalized pollutant concentration differences obtainable using common solvents. The differences suggest that lipid-normalized pollutant concentrations in fish muscle tissue will vary among studies without a standardized total lipid method, but more research is required to better identify complex neutral pollutant and lipid relationships before a final standard methodology can be selected. In the interim, we recommend that the Bligh-Dyer method with C/M be used to obtain total lipid for lipid-normalizing pollutant concentrations. If another solvent or system is used, the C/M extraction should be conducted on representative samples to allow for interconversion of lipid results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/etc.5620170504

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 40

Authors
Randall, R. C., Young, D. R., Lee, H., & Echols, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • American Scientific International, Hatfield Marine Science Center, 2111 Southeast Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365–5260, USA
Corresponding author
Lee, Henry
Venue
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
788-791
ISSN
  • 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8618
OpenAlex
W2101703686
Cited by
40
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Keywords
lipid extraction, lipid normalization, polychlorinated biphenyls, p,p'-DDE, fish muscle, hexane extraction, chloroform-methanol extraction, solvent extraction comparison, bioaccumulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review