The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The potential for estradiol and ethinylestradiol degradation in english rivers
Abstract
Water samples were collected in spring, summer, and winter from English rivers in urban/industrial (River Aire and River Calder, Yorkshire, UK) and rural environments (River Thames, Oxfordshire, UK) to study the biodegradation potential of the key steroid estrogen 17β-estradiol (E2) and its synthetic derivate ethinylestradiol (EE2). Microorganisms in the river water samples were capable of transforming E2 to estrone (E1) with half-lives of 0.2 to 9 d when incubated at 20°C. The E1 was then further degraded at similar rates. The most rapid biodegradation rates were associated with the downstream summer samples of the River Aire and River Calder. E2 degradation rates were similar for spiking concentrations throughout the range of 20 ng/L to 500 μg/L. Microbial cleavage of the steroid ring system was demonstrated by release of radiolabeled CO2 from the aromatic ring of E2 (position 4). When E2 was degraded, the loss of estrogenicity, measured by the yeast estrogen screen (YES) assay, closely followed the loss of the parent molecule. Thus, apart from the transient formation of E1, the degradation of E2 does not form other significantly estrogenic intermediates. The E2 could also be degraded when incubated with anaerobic bed sediments. Compared to E2, EE2 was much more resistant to biodegradation, but both E2 and EE2 were susceptible to photodegradation, with half-lives in the order of 10 d under ideal conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of risk from potential emerging contaminants in UK groundwater
Stuart, M., Lapworth, D., Crane, E., & Hart, A. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.072 · Cited by 801
Shi, J., Fujisawa, S., Nakai, S., & Hosomi, M. (2004) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.022 · Cited by 332
Kay, P., Hughes, S. R., Ault, J. R., Ashcroft, A. E., & Brown, L. E. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.087 · Cited by 147
“The Aire and Calder catchments, West Yorkshire, UK, are ideal for studying the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in rivers given the 105 WWTPs that discharge effluent into them (Fig.”
InfluentialThe occurrence, causes, and consequences of estrogens in the aquatic environment
Sumpter, J. P., & Jobling, S. (2013) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.2084 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Jürgens, M. D., Holthaus, K. I. E., Johnson, A. C., Smith, J. J. L., Hetheridge, M., & Williams, R. J.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-488
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2066349077
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The potential for estradiol and ethinylestradiol degradation in english rivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620210302
- The paper
- Jürgens, M. D., Holthaus, K. I. E., Johnson, A. C., Smith, J. J. L., Hetheridge, M., & Williams, R. J. (2002). The potential for estradiol and ethinylestradiol degradation in english rivers. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.