The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrated biomarker response: A useful tool for ecological risk assessment
Abstract
A battery of biomarkers is often used to evaluate the effects of exposure to chemical contaminants and detect responses to environmental stress. Unfortunately, field application of biomarkers is subject to various constraints (e.g., the availability of living material) that can limit data acquisition and prevent the use of multivariate methods during statistical analysis. In these circumstances, a simple method is needed to summarize biomarker responses and simplify their interpretation in biomonitoring programs. The present study used star plots to display results for the panel of biomarkers used for each station and survey. Integrated biomarker response (IBR) was then computed as the star plot area. Star plots using IBR values instead of biomarker data make it possible to visualize between-site and/or between-survey differences for comparison with exposure conditions. This approach was applied to sites in the Baltic Sea and the Seine Estuary, English Channel. In both cases, IBR values were visually compared to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) or polychlorobiphenyls (PCB) levels measured in mussel or fish tissues. The IBR, as an indicator of environmental stress, appears to be a useful tool for scientists and managers in assessing ecological risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adverse outcome pathways: opportunities, limitations and open questions
Leist, M., Ghallab, A., Graepel, R., Marchan, R., Hassan, R., Bennekou, S. H., Limonciel, A., Vinken, M., Schildknecht, S., Waldmann, T., et al. (2017) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2045-3 · Cited by 394
Broeg, K., & Lehtonen, K. K. (2006) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.02.004 · Cited by 315
Ferreira, N. G. C., Cardoso, D. N., Morgado, R., Soares, A. M. V. M., & Loureiro, S. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.025 · Cited by 41
Wang, C., Zhou, S., Wu, S., Tang, J., Li, H., & Du, J. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125764 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Beliaeff, B., & Burgeot, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1316-1322
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2040565479
- Cited by
- 1,292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated biomarker response: A useful tool for ecological risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/etc.5620210629
- The paper
- Beliaeff, B., & Burgeot, T. (2002). Integrated biomarker response: A useful tool for ecological risk assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.