The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solubility of nano-zinc oxide in environmentally and biologically important matrices
Open accessAbstract
Increasing manufacture and use of engineered nanoparticles is leading to a greater probability for release of engineered nanoparticles into the environment and exposure to organisms. In particular, zinc oxide (ZnO) is toxic, although it is unclear whether this toxicity is due to the zinc oxide nanoparticles, dissolution to Zn2+, or some combination thereof. The goal of this study was to determine the relative solubilities of both commercially available and in-house synthesized ZnO in matrices used for environmental fate and transport or biological toxicity studies. Dissolution of ZnO was observed in nanopure water (7.18–7.40 mg/L dissolved Zn, as measured by filtration) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI-1640) (∼5 mg/L), but much more dissolution was observed in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, in which the dissolved Zn concentration exceeded 34 mg/L. Moderately hard water exhibited low Zn solubility, likely because of precipitation of a Zn carbonate solid phase. Precipitation of a Zn-containing solid phase in RPMI also appeared to limit Zn solubility. Equilibrium conditions with respect to ZnO solubility were not apparent in these matrices, even after more than 1,000 h of dissolution. These results suggest that solution chemistry exerts a strong influence on ZnO dissolution and can result in limits on Zn solubility from precipitation of less soluble solid phases. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012;31:93–99. © 2011 SETAC
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Cited by
Ecotoxicity of manufactured ZnO nanoparticles – A review
Ma, H., Williams, P. L., & Diamond, S. A. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.08.011 · Cited by 910
Interactions of Dissolved Organic Matter with Natural and Engineered Inorganic Colloids: A Review
Philippe, A., & Schaumann, G. E. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502342r · Cited by 770
Nagaraju, G., Udayabhanu, Shivaraj, Prashanth, S. A., Shastri, M., Yathish, K. V., Anupama, C., & Rangappa, D. (2017) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.05.043 · Cited by 478
Mechanistic study on antibacterial action of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using green route
Agarwal, H., Menon, S., Venkat Kumar, S., & Rajeshkumar, S. (2018) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2018.03.008 · Cited by 447
Rossi, L., Fedenia, L. N., Sharifan, H., Ma, X., & Lombardini, L. (2019) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.12.005 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Reed, R. B., Ladner, D. A., Higgins, C. P., Westerhoff, P., & Ranville, J. F.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-99
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W2100404577
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.