The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Qualitative and quantitative inquiries are not incompatible: A call for a new partnership
Abstract
The argument that the qualitative and quantitative paradigms are incompatible is not convincing. An enduring and beneficial partnership between qualitative and quantitative researchers is possible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, we propose that in addressing this fundamental assumption, Reichardt and Rallis dismiss their own claim of compatibility between methodological camps.”
From Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research (2002) · cites this paper as Reichardt and Rallis, 1994
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1126/science.144.3617.424 · DOI
- Campbell D. T., 1974, The Philosophy of Karl Popper
- Campbell D. T., 1963, Handbook of Research on Teaching
- Campbell D. T., 1966, Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Research
- Cook T. D., 1983, Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research
- Cook T. D., 1985, Social Science and Social Policy
- Cook T. D., 1979, Quasi‐Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings
- 10.3102/0013189X015009012 · DOI
- Guba E. G., 1990, The Paradigm Dialog
- Guba E. G., 1989, Fourth‐Generation Evaluation
- Hanson N. R., 1958, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science
- Heap J. L., 1992, Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Literacy Research
- 10.3102/0013189X017008010 · DOI
- Lincoln Y. S., 1990, The Paradigm Dialog
- McCombs B. L., 1991, Learning‐Centered Psychological Principles: Guidelines for School Redesign and Reform
- Phillips D. C., 1990, The Paradigm Dialog
- 10.1063/1.3060577 · DOI · Paper page
- Reichardt C. S., 1979, Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research
- 10.1126/science.179.4070.250 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X015001004 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1014301607592 · Cited by 1,082
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- Venue
- New Directions for Program Evaluation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 1994
- Issue
- 61
- Pages
- 85-91
- ISSN
- 0164-7989 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-2371
- OpenAlex
- W1984763601
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Directions for Program Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- mixed methods, qualitative research, quantitative research, research collaboration, program evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
