Cited by 47Evaluation and Performance AssessmentCritical and Liberation PedagogyStudent Assessment and Feedback

Pedagogical Principles of Evaluation: Interpreting Freire

Patton, Michael Quinn·2017·New Directions for Evaluation

Abstract

Pedagogy of evaluation entails examining how and what evaluation teaches. Embedded in different evaluation approaches are varying assumptions, values, premises, priorities, sense‐making processes, and principles. Elucidating and illuminating principles is fundamental to identifying and understanding a pedagogy of evaluation. Ten pedagogical principles from Paulo Freire's writings are identified and explained. Each principle is then examined for its relevance to a critical pedagogy of evaluation for evaluation theory and practice today and looking forward. Freire understood and taught us that all interactions between and among people are pedagogical, something is always being taught, conveyed, and proselytized. Extending this insight to evaluation, Freire's work reminds us that all evaluation approaches constitute a pedagogy of some kind. What any particular evaluation teaches and how it is taught varies, but evaluation is inherently and predominantly a pedagogical interaction. This leads to the concluding question: What is your pedagogy of evaluation?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ev.20260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patton, M. Q.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Patton, Michael Quinn
Venue
New Directions for Evaluation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09
Volume
2017
Issue
155
Pages
49-77
ISSN
  • 1097-6736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-875X
OpenAlex
W2755325360
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Directions for Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
Paulo Freire, critical pedagogy, evaluation principles, evaluation theory, assessment practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review