Pedagogical Principles of Evaluation: Interpreting Freire
Abstract
Pedagogy of evaluation entails examining how and what evaluation teaches. Embedded in different evaluation approaches are varying assumptions, values, premises, priorities, sense‐making processes, and principles. Elucidating and illuminating principles is fundamental to identifying and understanding a pedagogy of evaluation. Ten pedagogical principles from Paulo Freire's writings are identified and explained. Each principle is then examined for its relevance to a critical pedagogy of evaluation for evaluation theory and practice today and looking forward. Freire understood and taught us that all interactions between and among people are pedagogical, something is always being taught, conveyed, and proselytized. Extending this insight to evaluation, Freire's work reminds us that all evaluation approaches constitute a pedagogy of some kind. What any particular evaluation teaches and how it is taught varies, but evaluation is inherently and predominantly a pedagogical interaction. This leads to the concluding question: What is your pedagogy of evaluation?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
López-García, D., García-García, V., Sampedro-Ortega, Y., Pomar-León, A., Tendero-Acin, G., Sastre-Morató, A., & Correro-Humanes, A. (2020) · Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.1080/21683565.2019.1649783 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Patton, M. Q.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Patton, Michael Quinn
- Venue
- New Directions for Evaluation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 2017
- Issue
- 155
- Pages
- 49-77
- ISSN
- 1097-6736 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-875X
- OpenAlex
- W2755325360
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Directions for Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- Paulo Freire, critical pedagogy, evaluation principles, evaluation theory, assessment practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review