The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in optically stimulated luminescence dating of individual grains of quartz from archeological deposits
Abstract
Paleoanthropologists and archeologists interested in occupation histories, faunal remains, and objects of material culture have become increasingly reliant on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating to construct Quaternary chronologies. In part, the increased use of OSL dating reflects its capacity to date events beyond the range of radiocarbon dating and in contexts where suitable organic materials are absent. An earlier review in Evolutionary Anthropology by Feathers 1 provides a general account of the principles of luminescence dating. Since then, however, important advances have been made in OSL dating of quartz, so that it is now possible to date individual sand‐sized grains and thereby resolve issues of postdepositional mixing of archeological sediments. In this review, we discuss the most important of these advances and their implications with regard to improved age control of archeological sites. We cover aspects of instrumental and methodological development that have facilitated the widespread measurement of single grains related to archeological questions and illustrate our review with some examples of where archeological problems have been resolved using single‐grain OSL dating. We do not propose single‐grain dating as a panacea, because there are instances where it is not straightforward to use or the results may be difficult to interpret; dating in such contexts remains the subject of continuing research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene
Marean, C. W., Bar-Matthews, M., Bernatchez, J., Fisher, E., Goldberg, P., Herries, A. I. R., Jacobs, Z., Jerardino, A., Karkanas, P., Minichillo, T., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06204 · Cited by 949
Self-citation
Cited by
Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago
Clarkson, C., Jacobs, Z., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Wallis, L., Smith, M., Roberts, R. G., Hayes, E., Lowe, K., Carah, X., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22968 · Cited by 1,185
Self-citationGalbraith, R. F., & Roberts, R. G. (2012) · Quaternary Geochronology · doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.020 · Cited by 731
Self-citationAges for the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa: Implications for Human Behavior and Dispersal
Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Galbraith, R. F., Deacon, H. J., Grün, R., Mackay, A., Mitchell, P., Vogelsang, R., & Wadley, L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1162219 · Cited by 530
Self-citationAn early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa
Brown, K. S., Marean, C. W., Jacobs, Z., Schoville, B. J., Oestmo, S., Fisher, E. C., Bernatchez, J., Karkanas, P., & Matthews, T. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11660 · Cited by 317
Self-citationOut of Africa and the evolution of human behavior
Klein, R. G. (2008) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20181 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobs, Z., & Roberts, R. G.
- Venue
- Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 210-223
- ISSN
- 1060-1538 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6505
- OpenAlex
- W2040281493
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in optically stimulated luminescence dating of individual grains of quartz from archeological deposits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/evan.20150
- The paper
- Jacobs, Z., & Roberts, R. G. (2007). Advances in optically stimulated luminescence dating of individual grains of quartz from archeological deposits. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20150
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.