Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Restoring the eastern oyster: how much progress has been made in 53 years?

Bersoza Hernández, Ada, Brumbaugh, Robert D, Frederick, Peter, Grizzle, Raymond, Luckenbach, Mark W, Peterson, Charles H, Angelini, Christine·2018·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

Coastal ecosystem restoration is accelerating globally as a means of enhancing shoreline protection, carbon storage, water quality, fisheries, and biodiversity. Among the most substantial of these efforts have been those focused on re‐establishing oyster reefs across the US Atlantic and Gulf coasts. Despite considerable investment, it is unclear how the scale of and approaches toward oyster restoration have evolved. A synthesis of 1768 projects undertaken since 1964 reveals that oyster substrate restoration efforts have primarily been concentrated in the Chesapeake Bay and the Gulf Coast, have been heavily reliant on oyster shell, and have re‐established 4.5% of the reef area that has been lost across all regions. By comparing costs to ecosystem service benefits, we discovered that the return‐on‐investment of oyster restoration varies widely, but generally increases with project size. To facilitate the recovery of coastal ecosystems and their services, scientists and resource managers must adopt a new restoration paradigm prioritizing investment in sites that maximize economic and ecological benefits and minimize construction costs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/fee.1935

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1111/cobi.12452 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/rec.12262 · DOI
  3. 10.1890/15-1077 · DOI
  4. 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5 · DOI
  5. Berry D, 2008, Maryland's skipjacks
  6. 10.1111/rec.12071 · DOI
  7. 10.3354/meps341303 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.3354/meps12362 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10152-004-0195-1 · DOI
  10. 10.2983/035.028.0114 · DOI
  11. FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 2014, The state of world fisheries and aquaculture: opportunities and challenges
  12. 10.3354/meps10188 · DOI
  13. 10.1890/04-0690 · DOI
  14. 10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.10 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Grizzle RE, 2016, Assessment of recent eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reef restoration projects in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire: planning for the future
  16. Grizzle RE, 2011, Oyster Restoration Research Project (ORRP) technical report
  17. 10.1126/science.1149345 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2983/035.031.0413 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0405150101 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0034-6667(92)90057-N · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.001 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.12.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1051/alr:2006029 · DOI
  24. 10.1656/045.020.0414 · DOI
  25. 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0128:HHDTFD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10152-004-0209-z · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.1128035 · DOI · Paper page
  28. MacKenzie CL, 1996, History of oystering in the United States and Canada featuring the eight greatest oyster estuaries, Mar Fish Rev, 58, 1
  29. Martin R, 2010, Commissioner aims to protect public health and shellfish industry
  30. 10.2983/035.028.0110 · DOI
  31. NAS (National Academies of Sciences), 2017, Effective monitoring to evaluate ecological restoration in the Gulf of Mexico
  32. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service), 2015, Annual commercial landing statistics
  33. 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.014 · DOI
  34. 10.3354/meps08164 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/gea.21484 · DOI
  36. 10.3389/fmars.2017.00127 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1176516 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.12.021 · DOI
  39. Southworth MJ, 1998, Oyster reef broodstock enhancement in the Great Wicomico River, Virginia, J Shellfish Res, 17, 1101
  40. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2006, Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well‐being: synthesis
  41. Wallace R, 2002, Optimum size for planting hatchery produced oyster seed: final technical report
  42. Westby SR, 2016, 2015 oyster restoration implementation update. Restoration progress in Harris Creek, Little Choptank River, and Tred Avon River combined
  43. 10.2983/035.028.0101 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.05.008 · DOI
  45. 10.1098/rspb.2012.0313 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/1365-2664.12576 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bersoza Hernández, A., Brumbaugh, R. D., Frederick, P., Grizzle, R., Luckenbach, M. W., Peterson, C. H., & Angelini, C.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Engineering Sciences Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment University of Florida Gainesville FL
  • The Nature Conservancy Coral Gables FL
  • Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation University of Florida Gainesville FL
  • Jackson Estuarine Laboratory University of New Hampshire Durham NH
  • Virginia Institute of Marine Science College of William and Mary Gloucester Point VA
  • Institute of Marine Sciences University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Morehead City NC
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-03
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
463-471
ISSN
  • 1540-9295
  • 1540-9309
Cited by
181
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review