Small artificial impoundments have big implications for hydrology and freshwater biodiversity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Headwater streams are critical for freshwater ecosystems. Global and continental studies consistently show major dams as dominant sources of hydrological stress threatening biodiversity in the world’s major rivers, but cumulative impacts from small artificial impoundments (SAIs) concentrated in headwater streams have rarely been acknowledged. Using the Murray Darling River basin (Australia) and the Arkansas River basin (US) as case studies, we examined the hydrological impacts of SAIs. The extent of their influence is considerable, altering hydrology in 280–380% more waterways as compared to major dams. Hydrological impacts are concentrated in smaller streams (catchment area <100 km 2), raising concerns that the often diverse and highly endemic biota found in these systems may be under threat. Adjusting existing biodiversity planning and management approaches to address the cumulative effects of many small and widely distributed artificial impoundments presents a rapidly emerging challenge for ecologically sustainable water management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Morden, R., Horne, A., Bond, N. R., Nathan, R., & Olden, J. D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morden, Robert
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-01-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-146
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-9309
- OpenAlex
- W4226133866
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- EarthArXiv (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- La Trobe University
- Funders
- Australian Government
- Australian Research Council (DE180100550)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
- Keywords
- headwater streams, hydrological impacts, freshwater biodiversity, cumulative effects, dams, Arkansas River Basin, endemic species, water management, biodiversity planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review