Cited by 63Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyWater resources management and optimization

Small artificial impoundments have big implications for hydrology and freshwater biodiversity

Open access
Morden, Robert, Horne, Avril, Bond, Nick R, Nathan, Rory, Olden, Julian D·2022·Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Headwater streams are critical for freshwater ecosystems. Global and continental studies consistently show major dams as dominant sources of hydrological stress threatening biodiversity in the world’s major rivers, but cumulative impacts from small artificial impoundments (SAIs) concentrated in headwater streams have rarely been acknowledged. Using the Murray Darling River basin (Australia) and the Arkansas River basin (US) as case studies, we examined the hydrological impacts of SAIs. The extent of their influence is considerable, altering hydrology in 280–380% more waterways as compared to major dams. Hydrological impacts are concentrated in smaller streams (catchment area <100 km 2), raising concerns that the often diverse and highly endemic biota found in these systems may be under threat. Adjusting existing biodiversity planning and management approaches to address the cumulative effects of many small and widely distributed artificial impoundments presents a rapidly emerging challenge for ecologically sustainable water management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/fee.2454

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 63

Authors
Morden, R., Horne, A., Bond, N. R., Nathan, R., & Olden, J. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Morden, Robert
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-11
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
141-146
ISSN
  • 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-9309
OpenAlex
W4226133866
Cited by
63
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7
FWCI
7.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • EarthArXiv (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • La Trobe University
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Australian Research Council (DE180100550)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Water resources management and optimization
Keywords
headwater streams, hydrological impacts, freshwater biodiversity, cumulative effects, dams, Arkansas River Basin, endemic species, water management, biodiversity planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review