Cited by 72Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBiofuel production and bioconversion

Advances in shrub‐willow crops for bioenergy, renewable products, and environmental benefits

Open access
Volk, Timothy A., Heavey, Justin P., Eisenbies, Mark H.·2016·Food and Energy Security

Abstract

Short‐rotation coppice systems like shrub willow are projected to be an important source of biomass in the United States for the production of bioenergy, biofuels, and renewable bio‐based products, with the potential for auxiliary environmental benefits and multifunctional systems. Almost three decades of research has focused on the development of shrub willow crops for biomass and ecosystem services. The current expansion of willow in New York State (about 500 ha) for the production of renewable power and heat has been possible because of incentive programs offered by the federal government, commitments by end users, the development of reliable harvesting systems, and extension services offered to growers. Improvements in the economics of the system are expected as willow production expands further, which should help lower establishment costs, enhance crop management options and increase efficiencies in harvesting and logistics. Deploying willow in multifunctional value‐added systems provides opportunities for both potential producers and end users to learn about the system and the quality of the biomass feedstock, which in turn will help overcome barriers to expansion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/fes3.82

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Willow plantations on agricultural sites have yielded more than 20-30 dry tonnes ha-1 yr-1.

    “Willow plantations on agricultural sites have yielded more than 20-30 dry tonnes (DT) ha -1 yr1 (Volk et al., 2016).”

    From SURFACE MINE TO BIOMASS FARM: GROWING SHRUB WILLOW (SALIX SPP.) IN NORTHEASTERN WEST VIRGINIA - FIRST YEAR RESULTS (2017) · cites this paper as Volk et al., 2016

    The Current Willow Biomass Production section (page unavailable) reports observed yields of 8–12 dry tonnes ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ across a range of sites, not more than 20–30. Its anticipated 20–40% yield increase is a projection, not an observed plantation yield. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Fabio, E. S., T. A. Volk, R. O. Miller, M. J. Serapiglia, H. G. Gauch, K. C. J. Van Rees, et al. (2016). Genotype by environment interactions analysis of North America shrub willow yield trials confirms superior performance of triploid hybrids. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12344. · DOI
  2. Patel, A. 2014. Life cycle analysis of shrub willow evapotranspiration covers compared to traditional geomembrane covers. Master's thesis, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry.
  3. Smart, L. B, M. J. Serapiglia, K. D. Cameron, A. J. Stipanovic, T. A. Volk and L. P. Abrahamson. 2008. Genetics of Yield and Biomass Composition of Shrub Willow Bioenergy Crops Bred and Selected in North America. In: Zalesny, Ronald S., Jr.; Mitchell, Rob; Richardson, Jim, eds. Biofuels, bioenergy, and bioproducts from sustainable agricultural and forest crops: proceedings of the short rotation crops international conference; 2008 August 19-20; Bloomington, MN. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-31. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 54.
  4. Tumminello, G., T. A. Volk, S. H. McArt, and M. K. Fierke 2015. Pollinator diversity associated with willow biomass crop. Entomological Society of America National Conference, Minneapolis, MN Nov 15-18, 2015.
  5. Volk, T. A., and V. Luzadis. 2009. Willow biomass production for bioenergy, biofuels and bioproducts in New York. Pp 238-260 in B. Solomon and V. A. Luzadis ed. Renewable energy from forest resources in the United States. Routledge Press, New York, NY.
  6. Volk, T. A., L. P. Abrahamson, T. Buchholz, J. Caputo, and M. Eisenbies. 2014. Development and deployment of willow biomass crops. Pp 201-217 in D. Karlen, ed. Cellulosic energy cropping systems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volk, T. A., Heavey, J. P., & Eisenbies, M. H.
Affiliations
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
Corresponding author
Volk, Timothy A.
Venue
Food and Energy Security
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
97-106
ISSN
2048-3694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346878102
Cited by
72
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food and Energy Security (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (30713)
  • New York State Department of Transportation (C‐06‐09)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
shrub willow, short rotation coppice, woody biomass, bioenergy, biofuels, ecosystem services, New York State, economic feasibility, environmental benefits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review