Antimicrobial activity of essential oils: the possibilities of TLC–bioautography
Abstract
Essential oils are well‐known for their antimicrobial activity against different plant and human pathogenic microorganisms. The results of the most commonly used antimicrobial assays are very different; sometimes their reliability is questionable, therefore standardized methods need to be used to solve this problem. The present study aims at the phytochemical characterization of some essential oils (thyme, lavender, eucalyptus, spearmint and cinnamon) that are important from the therapeutic and economic aspects and the optimized microbiological investigation of the effect of essential oils on human and plant pathogenic microorganisms. The chemical composition of the essential oils was analysed with thin‐layer chromatography (TLC) and their composition was controlled by gas chromatography (GC). The antibacterial effect was investigated using the TLC‐bioautographic method. The solvents applied in TLC developing systems were also tested. Our results showed that toluene, ethyl acetate, ethanol and chloroform as solvents used in the assay had no inhibiting effect on the test bacteria. The antibacterial activity of thyme, lavender and cinnamon oils and their main components (thymol, carvacrol, linalool, eugenol) was observed in the case of two plant pathogenic bacteria (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola) and some human pathogens (Staphylococcus epidermidis, S. saprophyticus and two strains of S. aureus, including one methicillin‐resistant strain). On the whole, the antibacterial activity of essential oils can be related to their most abundant components, but the effect of the minor components should also be taken into consideration. Direct bioautography is more cost‐effective and compares better with traditional microbiological laboratory methods (e.g. disc‐diffusion, agar‐plate technique). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For bacteria, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli strains are frequently used to identify antibacterial compounds in direct bioautography.
“For bacteria, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli strains are frequently used to identify antibacterial compounds [42], [53].”
From Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Several works have screened organic extracts, mainly plant extracts, for antibacterial and antifungal activity by TLC-bioautography.
“Several works have been done on the screening of organic extracts, mainly plant extracts, for antibacterial and antifungal activity by TLC–bioautography [42], [43].”
From Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review
Balouiri, M., Sadiki, M., & Ibnsouda, S. K. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005 · Cited by 7,264 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horváth, G., Jámbor, N., Végh, A., Böszörményi, A., Lemberkovics, É., Héthelyi, É., Kovács, K., & Kocsis, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Pecs (HU)
- Semmelweis University (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Horváth, Györgyi
- Venue
- Flavour and Fragrance Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 178-182
- ISSN
- 0882-5734 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1026
- OpenAlex
- W2014738223
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Flavour and Fragrance Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Általános Orvostudományi Kar, Pécsi Tudományegyetem
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Keywords
- essential oils, antimicrobial activity, TLC bioautography, thyme essential oil, lavender essential oil, eucalyptus oil, spearmint oil, cinnamon essential oil, thymol, carvacrol, linalool, eugenol, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola, Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, plant pathogenic bacteria, human pathogens, essential oil composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review