The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“How Probable is Probable? A Numerical Translation of Verbal Probability Expressions.”
Abstract
Abstract The reported experiment took place in a professional forecasting organization accustomed to giving verbal probability assessments (‘likely’, ‘probable’, etc.). It attempts to highlight the communication problems caused by verbal probability expressions and to offer possible solutions that are compatible with the forecasters overall perspective on their jobs Experts in the organization were first asked to give a numerical translation to 30 different verbal probability expressions most of which were taken from the organization's own published political forecasts. In a second part of the experiment the experts were given 15 paragraphs selected from the organization's political publications each of which contained at least one verbal expression of probability. Subjects were again asked to give a numerical translation to each verbal probability expression The results indicate that (a) there is a high variability in the interpretation of verbal probability expressions and (b) the variability is even higher in context. Possible reasons for the context effect are discussed and practical implications are suggested.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When analysts use terms like”
From The Value of Precision in Probability Assessment: Evidence from a Large-Scale Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament (2018) · cites this paper as Beyth-Merom 1982
Citations
Cites
Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.023 · Cited by 1,967
Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities
Lichtenstein, S., & Newman, J. R. (1967) · Psychonomic Science · doi:10.3758/bf03327890 · Cited by 313
Warner, J. (1968) · Journal of applied meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007 · Cited by 161
The specific meanings of certain terms indicating differing degrees of frequency
Simpson, R. H. (1944) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335634409381009 · Cited by 106
Value as a Determiner of Subjective Probability
Slovic, P. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics · doi:10.1109/thfe.1966.231980 · Cited by 78
Micrwave Maps of the Polar Ice of the Earth
Gloersen, P., Willicit, T. T., Chang, T., Nordberg, W., & Campbell, W. J. (1974) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1974)055 · Cited by 62
Stability in meanings for quantitative terms: A comparison over 20 years
Simpson, R. H. (1963) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335636309382600 · Cited by 58
Word usage and synonym representation in the English language.
Lepley, W. M., & Kobrick, J. L. (1952) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059745 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Heuer R. J., 1978, Quantitative approaches to political intelligence: The CIA experience
- Raiffa H., 1968, Decision analysis
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 525
Quasi-Bayesian Analysis Using Imprecise Probability Assessments And The Generalized Bayes’ Rule
Whitcomb, K. M. (2005) · Theory and Decision · doi:10.1007/s11238-005-2458-y · Cited by 9
A fuzzy logic approach to the management of linguistically expressed uncertainty
de Mántaras, R. L., Meseguer, P., Sanz, F., Carles Sierra, A., & Verdaguer, A. (1988) · IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL) · doi:10.1109/ismvl.1988.5167 · Cited by 9
Communicating the Results of Forensic Science ExaminationsPreprint
Jackson, G., Kaye, D. H., Neumann, C., Swienton, A. R., & Reyna, V. F. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 9
del Pozo, R. G., & Garcı́a-Lapresta, J. L. (2019) · Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa · doi:10.46661/revmetodoscuanteconempresa.3788 · Cited by 8
Lazaridou‐Chatzigoga, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12 · Cited by 9
A Day-to-day route choice model based on drivers’ past experience
Kim, H., & Lim, Y. (2012) · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12205-012-1285-2 · Cited by 8
Support Theory: A Nonextensional Representation of Subjective Probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.027 · Cited by 8
Matt, G. E., & Wilson, S. J. (1994) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(94)90036-1 · Cited by 8
Maciejovsky, B., & Budescu, D. V. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0033298 · Cited by 8
Coupling GIS and Multi-Criteria Modeling to Support Post-Accident Nuclear Risk Evaluation
Mercat-Rommens, C., Chakhar, S., Chojnacki, E., & Mousseau, V. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46816-6_13 · Cited by 7
A retrospective analysis of Journal of Forecasting: From 1982 to 2019
Yu, D., Sheng, L., & Shi, S. (2022) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.2921 · Cited by 7
Tetlock, P. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.034 · Cited by 7
Using inferred probabilities to measure the accuracy of imprecise forecasts
Lehner, P., Michelson, A., Adelman, L., & Goodman, A. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003272 · Cited by 7
When payoffs look like probabilities: Separating form and content in risky choice.
Müller‐Trede, J., Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000415 · Cited by 7
Individual behavior in organizational crises
Fischhoff, B. (1989) · Industrial Crisis Quarterly · doi:10.1177/108602668900300301 · Cited by 7
Shickle, D. (2000) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/a:1026585019832 · Cited by 7
Risk Communication and the Cognitive Representation of Uncertainty
Tonn, B. E., Goeltz, R. T., Travis, C. B., & Phillippi, R. H. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_21 · Cited by 7
Intelligent systems using Web-pages as knowledge base for statistical decision making
Fujimoto, K., & Matsuzawa, K. (1999) · New Generation Computing · doi:10.1007/bf03037241 · Cited by 7
INDOT Construction Inspection Priorities
Mostafavi, A., & Abraham, D. M. (2012) · Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · doi:10.5703/1288284314669 · Cited by 7
Eye-tracking evidence for fixation asymmetries in verbal and numerical quantifier processing
Holford, D., Juanchich, M., Foulsham, T., Sirota, M., & Clarke, A. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008056 · Cited by 5
The impact of construal level on review consistency and helpfulness in online evaluations
Kovács, B. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108550 · Cited by 7
Predicting Decisions in Language Based Persuasion Games
Apel, R., Erev, I., Reichart, R., & Tennenholtz, M. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13510 · Cited by 6
Rishniw, M., & Freeman, K. P. (2023) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.22.11.0488 · Cited by 6
Juanchich, M., Sirota, M., & Bonnefon, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.2 · Cited by 6
Schumacher, P. B. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.25 · Cited by 7
Certainly but not certain: The expression of subjective and objective probability
Yatsushiro, K., Trinh, T., Żygis, M., Solt, S., Benz, A., & Krifka, M. (2022) · Glossa a journal of general linguistics · doi:10.16995/glossa.5847 · Cited by 9
TAXONOMY OF UNCERTAINTIES AND RISK EVALUATION : A PROPOSAL OF THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Takemura, K., Kikkawa, T., & Fujii, S. (2004) · SOCIOTECHNICA · doi:10.3392/sociotechnica.2.12 · Cited by 6
INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACHES TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Siedel, G. J. (1992) · Journal of Legal Studies Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1722.1992.tb00226.x · Cited by 6
Risk it? Direct and collateral impacts of peers' verbal expressions about hazard likelihoods*
Windschitl, P. D., Smith, A. R., Scherer, A., & Suls, J. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1307785 · Cited by 4
Rubio‐Fernández, P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.23 · Cited by 6
Prike, T., Bijak, J., Higham, P. A., & Hilton, J. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000415 · Cited by 6
Bocklisch, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01559 · Cited by 6
Bergenström, A., & Sherr, L. (2003) · Psychology Health & Medicine · doi:10.1080/1354850310001604522 · Cited by 6
The role of vagueness in the numerical translation of verbal probabilities: A fuzzy approach
Bocklisch, F., Bocklisch, S. F., Baumann, M. R. K., Scholz, A., & Krems, J. F. (2010) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-136034 · Cited by 6
Decision frame for departure time choice under uncertainty
Fujii, S., & Kitamura, R. (2001) · INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING REVIEW · doi:10.2208/journalip.18.491 · Cited by 6
The expected value of frequency calibration
Clemen, R. T., & Murphy, A. H. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90024-4 · Cited by 6
Can't See the Forest Because of the Decision Trees: A Critique of Decision Analysis in Survey Texts
Chelst, K. R. (1998) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.28.2.80 · Cited by 6
Krocak, M. J., RIPBERGER, J. T., Ernst, S. R., Silva, C., & Jenkins‐Smith, H. C. (2021) · Weather and Forecasting · doi:10.1175/waf-d-21-0123.1 · Cited by 5
Tieu, L., & Romoli, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.22 · Cited by 5
Syrett, K. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.14 · Cited by 5
The Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Vogel, H., Appelbaum, S., Haller, H., & Ostermann, T. (2022) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti220798 · Cited by 7
Donner, W. R., Rodríguez, H., Brotzge, J. A., & Diaz, W. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05031-2_3 · Cited by 5
Techniques for the assessment of carcinogenic risk due to drinking water contaminants
Cothern, C. R., & Letkiewicz, F. J. (1986) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Control · doi:10.1080/10643388609381752 · Cited by 5
Applications of the theory of fuzzy sets
Perffl'eva, I. G. (1992) · Journal of Mathematical Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01097427 · Cited by 5
CONFAULT-AN EXPERT SYSTEM FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
Dias, W. P. S. (1992) · Civil Engineering Systems · doi:10.1080/02630259208970645 · Cited by 5
Spedden, S. E., & Ryan, P. B. (1992) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00710.x · Cited by 5
Probability perceptions and taxpayer decision-making behavior
Pforsich, H., Gill, S., & Sanders, D. (2010) · Advances in taxation · doi:10.1108/s1058-7497(2010)0000019003 · Cited by 5
Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.001 · Cited by 5
Judgements on health hazards to soil contamination by exposed and notexposed residents
Scholz, R. W., & Weber, O. (2001) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-a-004336029 · Cited by 5
Martire, K. A. (2018) · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1080/00450618.2018.1439101 · Cited by 10
Iurev, R., Garcı́a-Lapresta, J. L., García-Encina, P. A., Bolado, S., & Molinos‐Senante, M. (2025) · City and Environment Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2025.100193 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Forecasts on the Accuracy and Precision of Expectations
Barnfield, M., Phillips, J. B., Stoeckel, F., Lyons, B. A., Szewach, P., Thompson, J., Mérola, V., Stöckli, S., & Reifler, J. (2025) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaf003 · Cited by 4
The Vagueness of Verbal Probability and Frequency Expressions
Bocklisch, F. (2011) · Cited by 4
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Skordos, D., & Barner, D. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.1 · Cited by 4
Milkov, A. V. (2020) · Journal of Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1111/jpg.12771 · Cited by 4
Brooks, P. J., & Parshina, O. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.5 · Cited by 4
How Alike Is It? versus How Likely Is It?: A Disjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgments
Bar‐Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.005 · Cited by 4
Neace, W. P., Deer, K., Michaud, S. R., & Bolling, L. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7527-0_6 · Cited by 5
Decision-Making Phenomenon and Behavioral Decision Theory
Takemura, K. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54580-4_1 · Cited by 4
An elicitation principle of subject probabilities from statements on the Internet
Fujimoto, K., Matsuzawa, K., & Kazawa, H. (2003) · International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems (KES) · doi:10.1109/kes.1999.820222 · Cited by 4
An Anthology of Probabilistic Models for Medical Informatics
Dybowski, R., & Roberts, S. (2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-84628-119-9_10 · Cited by 4
The EPPO pest risk analysis scheme: comments on using risk scales
MacLeod, A. (2010) · EPPO Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.2009.02363.x · Cited by 4
Awasthi, V. N., Chow, C. W., & Harrison, P. D. (1998) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/s0748-5751(98)00022-0 · Cited by 4
Possible or Probable? An Experiential Approach to Probability Literacy
McLaren, C. H., & McLaren, B. J. (2014) · INFORMS Transactions on Education · doi:10.1287/ited.2014.0125 · Cited by 4
Fujii, S., Morita, T., Kitamura, R., & Sugiyama, M. (1999) · INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING REVIEW · doi:10.2208/journalip.16.569 · Cited by 4
Chinese vs US investors’ reactions to accounting narratives: an experiment
Yen, A. C., Riley, T. J., & Liao, P. (2017) · Asian Review of Accounting · doi:10.1108/ara-12-2016-0144 · Cited by 4
Tonhauser, J. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.30 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of a Method of Verbally Expressing Degree of Belief by Selecting Phrases from a List
Hamm, R. M. (1990) · doi:10.21236/ada226908 · Cited by 4
How to do things with logical expressions
Hilton, D., Vallée-Tourangeau, G., & Bonnefon, J. (2005) · Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems · doi:10.1075/is.6.1.08hil · Cited by 4
Kurbaan, A. S., SMITH, S., & MILLS, P. G. (2001) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heart.86.6.593 · Cited by 4
The expression of uncertainty: Two contextual effects
Fabre, J.-M. (1991) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541449108406236 · Cited by 4
Friedman, J. A., Lerner, J. S., & Zeckhauser, R. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2782598 · Cited by 2
Honda, H., & Yamagishi, K. (2006) · The Japanese journal of psychology · doi:10.4992/jjpsy.76.519 · Cited by 3
Replication Rate, Framing, and Format Affect Attitudes and Decisions about Science Claims
Barnes, R. M., Tobin, S. J., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., & Taglang, C. M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01826 · Cited by 3
Modeling transfer of high-order uncertain information.
Herbstritt, M., & Franke, M. (2017) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Decision-Making Phenomenon and Behavioral Decision Theory
Takemura, K. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5453-4_1 · Cited by 3
An appropriate verbal probability lexicon for communicating surgical risks is unlikely to exist.
Harris, A., Tran, T., Jenkins, S. C., Su, A., He, L.-X., Zhu, Y., & Gane, S. (2022) · Journal of experimental psychology. Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000423 · Cited by 3
Rishniw, M., & Freeman, K. P. (2023) · Veterinary Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1111/vcp.13284 · Cited by 3
Rishniw, M., & Freeman, K. P. (2023) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.23.08.0482 · Cited by 3
A comparison of human and GPT-4 use of probabilistic phrases in a coordination game
Maloney, L. T., Martello, M. F. D., Fei, V., & Ma, V. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56740-9 · Cited by 3
Song, H., & Schuldt, J. P. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12714 · Cited by 2
Holtgraves, T. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.32 · Cited by 3
Wilks, D. S. (2011) · International geophysics/International geophysics series · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385022-5.00002-6 · Cited by 3
Dowie, J. (1982) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/0144-8188(82)90005-9 · Cited by 3
Fuzzy-Pattern-Klassifikatoren als Modelle
Bocklisch, S. F., & Bocklisch, F. (2015) · Informatik-Spektrum · doi:10.1007/s00287-015-0922-9 · Cited by 3
Baghal, T. A. (2014) · Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences · doi:10.2458/v5i2.18476 · Cited by 3
Grigoroglou, M., & Anna Papafragou, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.18 · Cited by 3
Words about Uncertainty: Analogies and Contexts
Smithson, M. J. (1999) · Studies in fuzziness and soft computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_6 · Cited by 3
An Analysis of Shopping Choice behavior Using Fuzzy Multiattribute Attitude Model
Takemura, K. (1991) · Studies in Regional Science · doi:10.2457/srs.22.119 · Cited by 3
Pouscoulous, N., & Dulcinati, G. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.19 · Cited by 3
The effectiveness of imprecise probability forecasts
Benson, P. G., & Whitcomb, K. M. (1993) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.3980120207 · Cited by 3
Arithmetic computation with probability words and numbersPreprint
Mandel, D. R., Dhami, M. K., Tran, S., & Irwin, D. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hduf4 · Cited by 3
Hillman, T., Macgilchrist, F., & Kiesewetter, S. (2023) · On Education Journal for Research and Debate · doi:10.17899/on_ed.2023.18.3 · Cited by 2
The effects of confidence consistency and delay on perceptions of eyewitness credibility
Cash, D. K., Papesh, M. H., Russell, T. D., & Harrison, A. T. (2025) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12316 · Cited by 2
Rohde, H. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.21 · Cited by 2
Duke, M. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2364 · Cited by 4
Evaluating eyewitnesses: Translating expressions of pre‐ and post‐identification confidence
Cash, D. K., Russell, T. D., Harrison, A. T., & Papesh, M. H. (2024) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4163 · Cited by 2
Daga, G., Kossuth, L., Boruchowicz, C., Bóo, F. L., & Beer, N. L. (2024) · BMC Global and Public Health · doi:10.1186/s44263-024-00079-w · Cited by 2
Unpacking, Repacking, and Anchoring: Advances in Support Theory
Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.028 · Cited by 2
de Ruiter, J. P. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Beyth‐Marom, R.
- Corresponding author
- Beyth‐Marom, Ruth
- Venue
- Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-269
- ISSN
- 0277-6693 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-131X
- OpenAlex
- W2004776030
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forecasting (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- verbal probability expressions, probability communication, political forecasting, expert opinion, context effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review