The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exponential smoothing: The state of the art
Abstract
This paper is a critical review of exponential smoothing since the original work by Brown and Holt in the 1950s. Exponential smoothing is based on a pragmatic approach to forecasting which is shared in this review. The aim is to develop state‐of‐the‐art guidelines for application of the exponential smoothing methodology. The first part of the paper discusses the class of relatively simple models which rely on the Holt‐Winters procedure for seasonal adjustment of the data. Next, we review general exponential smoothing (GES), which uses Fourier functions of time to model seasonality. The research is reviewed according to the following questions. What are the useful properties of these models? What parameters should be used? How should the models be initialized? After the review of model‐building, we turn to problems in the maintenance of forecasting systems based on exponential smoothing. Topics in the maintenance area include the use of quality control models to detect bias in the forecast errors, adaptive parameters to improve the response to structural changes in the time series, and two‐stage forecasting, whereby we use a model of the errors or some other model of the data to improve our initial forecasts. Some of the major conclusions: the parameter ranges and starting values typically used in practice are arbitrary and may detract from accuracy. The empirical evidence favours Holt's model for trends over that of Brown. A linear trend should be damped at long horizons. The empirical evidence favours the Holt‐Winters approach to seasonal data over GES. It is difficult to justify GES in standard form–the equivalent ARIMA model is simpler and more efficient. The cumulative sum of the errors appears to be the most practical forecast monitoring device. There is no evidence that adaptive parameters improve forecast accuracy. In fact, the reverse may be true.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Taylor, S. J., & Letham, B. (2018) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1380080 · Cited by 2,737
Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194889 · Cited by 1,528
Forecasting Time Series With Complex Seasonal Patterns Using Exponential Smoothing
De Livera, A. M., Hyndman, R. J., & Snyder, R. D. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09771 · Cited by 1,049
What can we learn about the Ebola outbreak from tweets?
Odlum, M., & Yoon, S. (2015) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.023 · Cited by 234
Genetic Neural Architecture Search for automatic assessment of human sperm images
Miahi, E., Mirroshandel, S. A., & Nasr, A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115937 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, E. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 0277-6693 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-131X
- OpenAlex
- W2132782512
- Cited by
- 1,458
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/for.3980040103
- The paper
- Gardner, E. S. (1985). Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980040103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.