The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Back propagation in time‐series forecasting
Abstract
One of the major constraints on the use of back propagation neural networks as a practical forecasting tool is the number of training patterns needed. We propose a methodology that reduces the data requirements. The general idea is to use the Box‐Jenkins model in an exploratory phase to identify the 'lag components' of the series, to determine a compact network structure with one input unit for each lag, and then apply the validation procedure. This process minimizes the size of the network and consequently the data required to train the network. The results obtained in eight studies show the potential of the new methodology as an alternative to the traditional time‐series models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Forecasting with artificial neural networks:
Zhang, G., Eddy Patuwo, B., & Y. Hu, M. (1998) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(97)00044-7 · Cited by 4,229
Forecasting the Suez Canal traffic: A neural network analysis
Mostafa, M. M. (2004) · Maritime Policy & Management · doi:10.1080/0308883032000174463 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Lachtermacher, G., & Fuller, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Forecasting
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-393
- ISSN
- 0277-6693 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-131X
- OpenAlex
- W2088897322
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Back propagation in time‐series forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/for.3980140405
- The paper
- Lachtermacher, G., & Fuller, J. D. (1995). Back propagation in time‐series forecasting. Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980140405
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.