Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Back propagation in time‐series forecasting

Lachtermacher, Gerson, Fuller, J. David·1995·Journal of Forecasting

Abstract

One of the major constraints on the use of back propagation neural networks as a practical forecasting tool is the number of training patterns needed. We propose a methodology that reduces the data requirements. The general idea is to use the Box‐Jenkins model in an exploratory phase to identify the 'lag components' of the series, to determine a compact network structure with one input unit for each lag, and then apply the validation procedure. This process minimizes the size of the network and consequently the data required to train the network. The results obtained in eight studies show the potential of the new methodology as an alternative to the traditional time‐series models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/for.3980140405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Lachtermacher, G., & Fuller, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Forecasting
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-07
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
381-393
ISSN
  • 0277-6693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-131X
OpenAlex
W2088897322
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Back propagation in time‐series forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/for.3980140405
The paper
Lachtermacher, G., & Fuller, J. D. (1995). Back propagation in time‐series forecasting. Journal of Forecasting. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980140405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.