Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 577

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A literature survey of low‐rank tensor approximation techniques

Grasedyck, Lars, Kressner, Daniel, Tobler, Christine·2013·GAMM-Mitteilungen

Abstract

During the last years, low‐rank tensor approximation has been established as a new tool in scientific computing to address large‐scale linear and multilinear algebra problems, which would be intractable by classical techniques. This survey attempts to give a literature overview of current developments in this area, with an emphasis on function‐related tensors. (© 2013 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gamm.201310004

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 144 references

Cited by

See all 577

Metadata

Authors
Grasedyck, L., Kressner, D., & Tobler, C.
Venue
GAMM-Mitteilungen
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
53-78
ISSN
  • 0936-7195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2608
OpenAlex
W1967077133
Cited by
577
References
144
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A literature survey of low‐rank tensor approximation techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gamm.201310004
The paper
Grasedyck, L., Kressner, D., & Tobler, C. (2013). A literature survey of low‐rank tensor approximation techniques. GAMM-Mitteilungen. https://doi.org/10.1002/gamm.201310004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.