The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SNP Selection in genome‐wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regression
Open accessAbstract
Penalized regression methods offer an attractive alternative to single marker testing in genetic association analysis. Penalized regression methods shrink down to zero the coefficient of markers that have little apparent effect on the trait of interest, resulting in a parsimonious subset of what we hope are true pertinent predictors. Here we explore the performance of penalization in selecting SNPs as predictors in genetic association studies. The strength of the penalty can be chosen either to select a good predictive model (via methods such as computationally expensive cross validation), through maximum likelihood‐based model selection criterion (such as the BIC), or to select a model that controls for type I error, as done here. We have investigated the performance of several penalized logistic regression approaches, simulating data under a variety of disease locus effect size and linkage disequilibrium patterns. We compared several penalties, including the elastic net, ridge, Lasso, MCP and the normal‐exponential‐γ shrinkage prior implemented in the hyperlasso software, to standard single locus analysis and simple forward stepwise regression. We examined how markers enter the model as penalties and P‐value thresholds are varied, and report the sensitivity and specificity of each of the methods. Results show that penalized methods outperform single marker analysis, with the main difference being that penalized methods allow the simultaneous inclusion of a number of markers, and generally do not allow correlated variables to enter the model, producing a sparse model in which most of the identified explanatory markers are accounted for.Genet. Epidemiol. 34:879–891, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442
The International HapMap Project
†The International HapMap Consortium, Genotyping centres: Baylor College of Medicine and ParAllele BioScience, Gibbs, R. A., Belmont, J. W., Hardenbol, P., Willis, T. D., Yu, F., Chinese HapMap Consortium, Yang, H., Ch'ang, L.-Y., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02168 · Cited by 6,057
Atkinson, M. A., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Michels, A. W. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60591-7 · Cited by 2,931
A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants
Scott, L. J., Mohlke, K. L., Bonnycastle, L. L., Willer, C. J., Li, Y., Duren, W. L., Erdos, M. R., Stringham, H. M., Chines, P. S., Jackson, A. U., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142382 · Cited by 2,753
A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes
Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2088 · Cited by 2,609
Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci
Easton, D. F., Pooley, K. A., Dunning, A. M., Pharoah, P. D. P., Thompson, D., Ballinger, D. G., Struewing, J. P., Morrison, J., Field, H., Luben, R., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05887 · Cited by 2,319
Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in UK Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes
Zeggini, E., Weedon, M. N., Lindgren, C. M., Frayling, T. M., Elliott, K. S., Lango, H., Timpson, N. J., Perry, J. R. B., Rayner, N. W., Freathy, R. M., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142364 · Cited by 2,194
Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease
Ueda, H., Howson, J. M. M., Esposito, L., Heward, J., Snook, Chamberlain, G., Rainbow, D. B., Hunter, K. M. D., Smith, A. N., Di Genova, G., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01621 · Cited by 2,175
Self-citationRobust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes
Finland, G. O. T. 1. D. I., Todd, J. A., the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Walker, N. M., Cooper, J. D., Smyth, D. J., Downes, K., Plagnol, V., Bailey, R., Nejentsev, S., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2068 · Cited by 1,456
Cited by
Wang, S.-B., Feng, J.-Y., Ren, W.-L., Huang, B., Zhou, L., Wen, Y.-J., Zhang, J., Dunwell, J. M., Xu, S., & Zhang, Y.-M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19444 · Cited by 513
Selecting instruments for Mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies.
Swerdlow, D. I., Kuchenbaecker, K. B., Shah, S., Sofat, R., Holmes, M. V., White, J., Mindell, J. S., Kivimaki, M., Brunner, E. J., Whittaker, J. C., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw088 · Cited by 387
Feature Selection Boosted by Unselected Features
Zheng, W., Chen, S., Fu, Z., Zhu, F., Yan, H., & Yang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3058172 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayers, K. L., & Cordell, H. J.
- Venue
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-22
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 879-891
- ISSN
- 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2272
- OpenAlex
- W2160068277
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SNP Selection in genome‐wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gepi.20543
- The paper
- Ayers, K. L., & Cordell, H. J. (2010). SNP Selection in genome‐wide and candidate gene studies via penalized logistic regression. Genetic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
