Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients

Open access
Manning, Alisa K., LaValley, Michael, Liu, Ching-Ti, Rice, Kenneth, An, Ping, Liu, Yongmei, Miljkovic, Iva, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Harris, Tamara B., Province, Michael A., Borecki, Ingrid B., Florez, Jose C., Meigs, James B., Cupples, L. Adrienne, Dupuis, Josée·2011·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Genetic discoveries are validated through the meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans in large international consortia. Because environmental variables may interact with genetic factors, investigation of differing genetic effects for distinct levels of an environmental exposure in these large consortia may yield additional susceptibility loci undetected by main effects analysis. We describe a method of joint meta-analysis (JMA) of SNP and SNP by Environment (SNP × E) regression coefficients for use in gene-environment interaction studies. METHODS: In testing SNP × E interactions, one approach uses a two degree of freedom test to identify genetic variants that influence the trait of interest. This approach detects both main and interaction effects between the trait and the SNP. We propose a method to jointly meta-analyze the SNP and SNP × E coefficients using multivariate generalized least squares. This approach provides confidence intervals of the two estimates, a joint significance test for SNP and SNP × E terms, and a test of homogeneity across samples. RESULTS: We present a simulation study comparing this method to four other methods of meta-analysis and demonstrate that the JMA performs better than the others when both main and interaction effects are present. Additionally, we implemented our methods in a meta-analysis of the association between SNPs from the type 2 diabetes-associated gene PPARG and log-transformed fasting insulin levels and interaction by body mass index in a combined sample of 19,466 individuals from five cohorts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20546

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Manning, A. K., LaValley, M., Liu, C.-T., Rice, K., An, P., Liu, Y., Miljkovic, I., Rasmussen-Torvik, L., Harris, T. B., Province, M. A., Borecki, I. B., Florez, J. C., Meigs, J. B., Cupples, L. A., & Dupuis, J.
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
11-18
ISSN
0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126086474
Cited by
183
References
5
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gepi.20546
The paper
Manning, A. K., LaValley, M., Liu, C.-T., Rice, K., An, P., Liu, Y., Miljkovic, I., Rasmussen-Torvik, L., Harris, T. B., Province, M. A., Borecki, I. B., Florez, J. C., Meigs, J. B., Cupples, L. A., & Dupuis, J. (2011). Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients. Genetic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20546

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.