The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Genetic discoveries are validated through the meta-analysis of genome-wide association scans in large international consortia. Because environmental variables may interact with genetic factors, investigation of differing genetic effects for distinct levels of an environmental exposure in these large consortia may yield additional susceptibility loci undetected by main effects analysis. We describe a method of joint meta-analysis (JMA) of SNP and SNP by Environment (SNP × E) regression coefficients for use in gene-environment interaction studies. METHODS: In testing SNP × E interactions, one approach uses a two degree of freedom test to identify genetic variants that influence the trait of interest. This approach detects both main and interaction effects between the trait and the SNP. We propose a method to jointly meta-analyze the SNP and SNP × E coefficients using multivariate generalized least squares. This approach provides confidence intervals of the two estimates, a joint significance test for SNP and SNP × E terms, and a test of homogeneity across samples. RESULTS: We present a simulation study comparing this method to four other methods of meta-analysis and demonstrate that the JMA performs better than the others when both main and interaction effects are present. Additionally, we implemented our methods in a meta-analysis of the association between SNPs from the type 2 diabetes-associated gene PPARG and log-transformed fasting insulin levels and interaction by body mass index in a combined sample of 19,466 individuals from five cohorts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges
McCarthy, M. I., Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., Goldstein, D. B., Little, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Hirschhorn, J. N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2344 · Cited by 2,891
GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis
Aulchenko, Y. S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A., & van Duijn, C. M. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108 · Cited by 1,836 · cited 1×
“Individual studies can obtain the required regression and covariance estimates for interaction regression models using QUICKTEST version 0.95 (http://toby.freeshell.org/ software) and ProbABEL version 0.1–3 (http://mga.bionet. nsc.ru/ yurii/ABEL/) [Aulchenko et al., 2007].”
MethodInfluentialExploiting Gene-Environment Interaction to Detect Genetic Associations
Kraft, P., Yen, Y.-C., Stram, D. O., Morrison, J., & Gauderman, W. J. (2007) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000099183 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies
Tam, V., Patel, N., Turcotte, M., Bossé, Y., Paré, G., & Meyre, D. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1 · Cited by 2,092
Manning, A. K., Hivert, M.-F., Scott, R. A., Grimsby, J. L., Bouatia-Naji, N., Chen, H., Rybin, D., Liu, C.-T., Bielak, L. F., Prokopenko, I., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2274 · Cited by 827
Self-citationMeta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond
Evangelou, E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3472 · Cited by 596
Korte, A., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Segura, V., Platt, A., Long, Q., & Nordborg, M. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2376 · Cited by 446
Genome-wide association studies of obesity and metabolic syndrome
Fall, T., & Ingelsson, E. (2014) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2012.08.018 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Manning, A. K., LaValley, M., Liu, C.-T., Rice, K., An, P., Liu, Y., Miljkovic, I., Rasmussen-Torvik, L., Harris, T. B., Province, M. A., Borecki, I. B., Florez, J. C., Meigs, J. B., Cupples, L. A., & Dupuis, J.
- Venue
- Genetic Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-22
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-18
- ISSN
- 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126086474
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gepi.20546
- The paper
- Manning, A. K., LaValley, M., Liu, C.-T., Rice, K., An, P., Liu, Y., Miljkovic, I., Rasmussen-Torvik, L., Harris, T. B., Province, M. A., Borecki, I. B., Florez, J. C., Meigs, J. B., Cupples, L. A., & Dupuis, J. (2011). Meta-analysis of gene-environment interaction: joint estimation of SNP and SNP × environment regression coefficients. Genetic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.