Cited by 139Echinoderm biology and ecologyPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The pre‐radial history of echinoderms

Smith, Andrew B.·2005·Geological Journal

Abstract

Gene sequence data now identify a robust phylogeny of deuterostomes and provide a framework within which the evolution of echinoderms can be interpreted. The topology of the molecular tree makes a number of important predictions about the morphological characters of the earliest echinoderm at its split from hemichordates: it possessed gill slits (but not a notochord), had a bilaterally symmetrical body plan in the adult and, less certainly, underwent torsion during development. Carpoids, a highly contentious group of extinct deuterostomes with a plated calcite skeleton that have variously been interpreted as stem‐ and crown‐group chordates, stem‐group echinoderms or stem‐ and crown‐group echinoderms, display many of these basal characters and provide critical evidence for how the latest common ancestor of hemichordates and echinoderms was transformed into a pentaradiate crown‐group echinoderm. Cinctans have a large atrial opening in addition to mouth and anus, and are interpreted as pharyngeal basket feeders. The paired grooves associated with the mouth indicate the presence of a hydrovascular system, but not necessarily one built along the echinoderm plan (that is, derived from just the left hydrocoel). Stylophorans have a bilateral body plan that is externally masked by torsion and possess gills, either unpaired and external, or paired and internal, opening into an atrial cavity. Their bilateral appendage is a locomotory organ, not an ambulacrum, and there is no evidence that stylophorans ever possessed a well‐developed hydrovascular system homologous to the water vascular system of echinoderms and the tentacles of pterobranch hemichordates. Solutes are the most crownward, having a true echinodermal ambulacral system with a single hydropore and no pharyngeal gill openings. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gj.1018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A. B.
Affiliations
Natural History Museum (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Andrew B.
Venue
Geological Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
255-280
ISSN
  • 0072-1050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1034
OpenAlex
W2101544128
Cited by
139
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geological Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
echinoderm evolution, hemichordates, solutes, gill slits, torsion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review