Cited by 87Autophagy in Disease and TherapyUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Autophagy is activated by proteasomal inhibition and involved in aggresome clearance in cultured astrocytes

Jänen, Sven B., Chaachouay, Hassan, Richter‐Landsberg, Christiane·2010·Glia

Abstract

A common pathway underlying a variety of neurodegenerative disorders is the aggregation and deposition of misfolded proteins. Proteasomal inhibition has been demonstrated to promote the formation of intracellular inclusions. We have shown before that astrocytes respond to the treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG‐132 by aggresome formation and cytoskeletal disturbances, but unlike oligodendrocytes do not die by apoptotic cell death and have the capability to recover. This study was undertaken to elucidate if the autophagy‐lysosomal pathway participates in the efficient recovery process in astrocytes and is modulated under conditions of proteasomal inhibition. The data show that the autophagic pathway was stimulated during a 24‐h treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG‐132 in a time and concentration‐dependent manner. It remained at an elevated level throughout a 24‐h recovery period in the absence of MG‐132 and participates in the aggregate clearing process. In the presence of the specific inhibitor of macroautophagy, 3‐methyladenine, cell viability was impaired, aggregates were not as efficiently removed and HSP25, αB‐crystallin and ubiquitinated proteins remained in the insoluble protein fraction. LC3‐II positive puncta, indicative of autophagosomes, were formed abundantly in the cells after proteasome inhibition and were seen in close association with the aggregates. Hence, the ability of astrocytes to upregulate autophagic degradation might contribute to their resistance against proteasomal stress situations and act as a compensatory mechanism when the proteasome is impaired. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.21047

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 87

Authors
Jänen, S. B., Chaachouay, H., & Richter‐Landsberg, C.
Affiliations
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Richter‐Landsberg, Christiane
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-19
Volume
58
Issue
14
Pages
1766-1774
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2133149402
Cited by
87
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
autophagy, proteasome inhibition, astrocytes, MG132, 3-methyladenine, autophagosomes, LC3, protein aggregation, neurodegenerative diseases, HSP25, alphaB-crystallin, ubiquitinated proteins
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Astrocytes, Autophagy, Cell Aggregation, Cells, Cultured, Inclusion Bodies, Cytoskeleton, Leupeptins, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Rats, Wistar, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats, Proteasome Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review