Autophagy is activated by proteasomal inhibition and involved in aggresome clearance in cultured astrocytes
Abstract
A common pathway underlying a variety of neurodegenerative disorders is the aggregation and deposition of misfolded proteins. Proteasomal inhibition has been demonstrated to promote the formation of intracellular inclusions. We have shown before that astrocytes respond to the treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG‐132 by aggresome formation and cytoskeletal disturbances, but unlike oligodendrocytes do not die by apoptotic cell death and have the capability to recover. This study was undertaken to elucidate if the autophagy‐lysosomal pathway participates in the efficient recovery process in astrocytes and is modulated under conditions of proteasomal inhibition. The data show that the autophagic pathway was stimulated during a 24‐h treatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG‐132 in a time and concentration‐dependent manner. It remained at an elevated level throughout a 24‐h recovery period in the absence of MG‐132 and participates in the aggregate clearing process. In the presence of the specific inhibitor of macroautophagy, 3‐methyladenine, cell viability was impaired, aggregates were not as efficiently removed and HSP25, αB‐crystallin and ubiquitinated proteins remained in the insoluble protein fraction. LC3‐II positive puncta, indicative of autophagosomes, were formed abundantly in the cells after proteasome inhibition and were seen in close association with the aggregates. Hence, the ability of astrocytes to upregulate autophagic degradation might contribute to their resistance against proteasomal stress situations and act as a compensatory mechanism when the proteasome is impaired. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autophagy is activated in astrocytes to compensate for inhibition of the UPS.
“Similar to neurons [397], autophagy is activated in astrocytes to compensate for inhibition of the UPS [398].”
From Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [398]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Jänen, S. B., Chaachouay, H., & Richter‐Landsberg, C.
- Affiliations
- Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Richter‐Landsberg, Christiane
- Venue
- Glia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-19
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1766-1774
- ISSN
- 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1136
- OpenAlex
- W2133149402
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Glia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- autophagy, proteasome inhibition, astrocytes, MG132, 3-methyladenine, autophagosomes, LC3, protein aggregation, neurodegenerative diseases, HSP25, alphaB-crystallin, ubiquitinated proteins
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animals, Newborn, Astrocytes, Autophagy, Cell Aggregation, Cells, Cultured, Inclusion Bodies, Cytoskeleton, Leupeptins, Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors, Rats, Wistar, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Rats, Proteasome Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review