Cited by 48Retinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy researchBarrier Structure and Function Studies

AAV‐mediated gene delivery in Dp71‐null mouse model with compromised barriers

Open access
Vacca, Ophélie, Darche, Marie, Schaffer, David V., Flannery, John G., Sahel, José‐Alain, Rendon, Alvaro, Dalkara, Deniz·2014·Glia

Abstract

Formation and maintenance of the blood–retinal barrier (BRB) is required for proper vision and breaching of this barrier contributes to the pathology in a wide variety of retinal conditions such as retinal detachment and diabetic retinopathy. Dystrophin Dp71 being a key membrane cytoskeletal protein, expressed mainly in Müller cells, its absence has been related to BRB permeability through delocalization and down‐regulation of the AQP4 and Kir4.1 channels. Dp71‐null mouse is thus an excellent model to approach the study of retinal pathologies showing blood–retinal barrier permeability. We aimed to investigate the participation of Müller cells in the BRB and in the inner limiting membrane of Dp71‐null mice compared with wild‐type mice in order to understand how these barriers work in this model of permeable BRB. To this aim, we used an Adeno‐associated virus (AAV) variant, ShH10‐GFP, engineered to target Müller cells specifically. ShH10 coding GFP was introduced by intravitreal injection and Müller cell transduction was studied in Dp71‐null mice in comparison to wild‐type animals. We show that Müller cell transduction follows a significantly different pattern in Dp71‐null mice indicating changes in viral cell‐surface receptors as well as differences in the permeability of the inner limiting membrane in this mouse line. However, the compromised BRB of the Dp71‐null mice does not lead to virus leakage into the bloodstream when the virus is injected intravitreally – an important consideration for AAV‐mediated retinal gene therapy. GLIA 2014;62:468–476

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.22617

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a DP71-null mouse model of retinal degeneration and blood-retinal barrier permeability, intravitreal injection increased gene delivery to Müller cells and photoreceptors.

    “Additionally, in a DP71-null mouse model of retinal degeneration and blood-retinal barrier permeability, gene delivery to Muller cells and photoreceptors via intravitreal injection increased.67”

    From Antibody neutralization poses a barrier to intravitreal adeno-associated viral vector gene delivery to non-human primates (2015) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports enhanced Müller-cell transduction after intravitreal ShH10 injection, and the photoreceptor Results section reports strong transduction after intravitreal AAV5 injection in Dp71-null mice compared with wild-type mice. The Introduction describes this mouse as a model of permeable blood-retinal barriers that emulates some hallmarks of diseases including age-related macular degeneration, but does not establish it as a model of retinal degeneration itself. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 48

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Durbeej M. 2010. Laminins. Cell Tissue Res 339(1):259-268.
  2. Yanoff M, Fine BS. 1996. Occular Pathology. Mosby-Wolfe.

Authors
Vacca, O., Darche, M., Schaffer, D. V., Flannery, J. G., Sahel, J., Rendon, A., & Dalkara, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Institut de la Vision/INSERM/UPMC, Univ Paris 06/CNRS/CHNO des Quinze‐Vingts Paris France
Corresponding author
Dalkara, Deniz
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-31
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
468-476
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W1585127964
Cited by
48
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY022975)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
adeno-associated virus, AAV gene delivery, blood-retinal barrier permeability, Müller cells, internal limiting membrane, intravitreal injection, retinal gene therapy, aquaporin-4, Kir4.1
MeSH terms
Adenoviridae, Animals, Blood-Retinal Barrier, Disease Models, Animal, Fundus Oculi, Photoreceptor Cells, Retina, Retinal Diseases, Visual Pathways, Dystrophin, Gene Transfer Techniques, Mice, Knockout, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice, Ependymoglial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review