What do we know about dementia?: a survey on knowledge about dementia in the general public of Japan
Abstract
Objective The importance of early detection of dementia has been highlighted in recent years by the medical and scientific community; however, delays often occur between the recognition of signs or symptoms and a decision by the patient or family to seek professional help. Such delays may be caused by a lack of knowledge about dementia among patients and family members. The aim of this study was to determine the understanding of dementia among the general public. Methods We conducted a survey in Japan that asked 11 questions regarding knowledge of 'general' information, 'symptoms', and 'biomedical' issues related to dementia. A quota sampling method was used to select 2,500 participants, 2,115 of who were eligible for the analyses. Results The average number of correct responses among females was significantly greater than that among the males. A multiple comparisons test demonstrated that middle-aged women were more knowledgeable than younger and older respondents. It was revealed that there was a lack of knowledge on biomedical aspects of dementia, i.e. cause, treatment, and prognosis along with a misunderstanding of dementia as senescence forgetfulness among the general public. Conclusions There appeared to be gaps in knowledge on dementia among the general public, which may prevent caregivers from planning upcoming social and financial challenges. Correct information needs to be given by health professionals and care staff. Educational initiatives planned for the general…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and expert opinions from geriatrists, gerontologists, and older adult care specialists, aiming to assess public knowledge about dementia.
“The questionnaire was developed based on previous studies and expert opinions from geriatrists, gerontologists, and older adult care specialists, aiming to assess public knowledge about dementia. 15-19”
From Dementia Knowledge in Older and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
Women had more information about dementia than men.
“Similar to other studies the results show that women had more information about dementia than men.”
From Dementia Knowledge in Older and Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 109
- Authors
- Arai, Y., Arai, A., & Zarit, S. H.
- Affiliations
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arai, Yumiko
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 433-438
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2019055268
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Health › Health, Education, and Aging
- Keywords
- dementia, dementia awareness, early detection of dementia, dementia symptoms, sex differences in knowledge, age differences in knowledge, dementia education, Japan
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Dementia, Female, Humans, Japan, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review