Non‐pharmacological management of behavioural symptoms in nursing homes
Abstract
Background: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are often reported in institutions for the elderly. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a staff education intervention to manage BPSD in older people with a diagnosis of dementia. Methods: The trial was conducted in 16 nursing homes; 306 patients with a diagnosis of dementia and presenting BPSD were selected. Nursing homes were randomly allocated to an intervention group or a control group. An 8‐week staff education and training programme was conducted in the nursing homes in the intervention group. The main outcome measures were the Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and an Observation Scale (OS) score. Assessments were done at baseline (W0), at the end of the ‘intervention’ period (W8) and 12 weeks after (W20). Results: There was a significant decrease in the global CMAI score between baseline and W8 (−7.8; p > 0.01) and between baseline and W20 (−6.5; p > 0.01) in the intervention group but not in the control group. Results of mixed linear models showed that the CMAI global score, the CMAI physically non‐aggressive behaviours subscale score and verbally non‐aggressive behaviours subscale score significantly decreased in the intervention group (p < 0.001) although there was no significant evolution in the control group. Direct assessment with the OS produced the same pattern of results, with a significant decrease only in the intervention group. Conclusion: The intervention reduced BPSD in severely demented nursing home residents and this effect was still present 3 months after the end of the programme. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Antipsychotics cause excess mortality and are of limited efficacy.
“antipsychotics cause excess mortality and are of limited efficacy. 11”
From Non-pharmacological interventions for agitation in dementia: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2014) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 102
- Authors
- Deudon, A., Maubourguet, N., Gervais, X., Leone, E., Brocker, P., Carcaillon, L., Riff, S., Lavallart, B., & Robert, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (FR)
- Générale de Santé (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Robert, Philippe Henri
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1386-1395
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2125365283
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, nursing homes, employee training, non-pharmacological treatment, agitation, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, older adults with dementia, long-term care
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Education, Nursing, Continuing, Female, France, Geriatric Nursing, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Staff Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review