The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of special and traditional dementia care in nursing homes: results from a cross‐sectional study in Germany
Abstract
Objective: Two‐thirds of all residents in nursing homes in Germany suffer from some type of dementia. We investigated whether or not dementia patients receiving special (segregated or partially segregated) care exhibited a better quality of life than their counterparts residing in traditional nursing homes. Methods: In a cross‐sectional study in 28 special dementia care facilities in the city of Hamburg (admission criterion: mobile dementia patients with behaviour problems) 594 residents were compared to a group of nursing home residents with dementia (n = 573) in 11 randomly selected nursing homes who were receiving traditional integrative care. Primary features such as cognitive and functional impairment, and behaviour problems were assessed by qualified nursing staff. Results: Controlling for confounding variables, for dementia patients in special care units as compared to a reference group in traditional integrative care, the level of volunteer caregiver involvement was higher and there was more social contact to staff, fewer physical restraints, more involvement in home activities, and more frequent use of psychiatrists. There was no significant difference between the two care settings with regard to overall use of psychotropic drugs, however, residents in special dementia care used antipsychotics significantly less often and antidepressants more often. Conclusions: Significant differences for a number of indicators of the quality of life point in favour of special dementia care. Future evaluation studies ought to examine not only the general efficacy of types of care designed especially for dementia patients but also the efficacy of the respective individual components (i.e. caregiver ratio). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Better functional abilities in the SCU group at baseline compared to the n-SCU group were found in 6 studies with large, moderate and small effect sizes or significant p values.
“Better functional abilities in the SCU group at baseline compared to the n-SCU group were found in 6 studies with large [8], moderate [9] and small [27,34,35] effect sizes or significant p values [44].”
From Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01405.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00019442-200105000-00008 · DOI
- Beers MH, 1991, Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing homes residents, Arch Intern Med, 151, 1825, 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400090107019 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440350031003 · DOI
- 10.1177/1471301205051095 · DOI
- 10.1300/J018v11n01_03 · DOI
- 10.1017/S104161029600261X · DOI
- 10.1093/geronj/44.3.M77 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03470.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/153331750101600506 · DOI
- 10.1177/153331759601100203 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01559.x · DOI
- Holmes D, 2000, Special Care Units, 7
- 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233 · DOI
- 10.1093/ageing/afm108 · DOI
- 10.1097/00002093-199700112-00007 · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/51B.1.P3 · DOI · Paper page
- McCann JJ, 2000, Special Care Units, 141
- Mahoney FI, 1965, Functional evaluation. The Barthel index, Md State Med J, 2, 61
- 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.92 · DOI
- 10.3928/0098-9134-19920301-07 · DOI
- Sloane PD, 1991, Physical and pharmacologic restraint of nursing home patients with dementia. Impact of specialised units, JAMA, 265, 1278, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460100080028 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02720.x · DOI
- Schneekloth U, 2009, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung in stationären Einrichtungen (MuG IV). Demenz, Angehörige und Freiwillige, Versorgungssituation sowie Beispielen für “Good Practice”, 159
- Van Haitsma K, 2000, Special Care Units, 163
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06856.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S1041610203009475 · DOI
- Zimber A, 1996, Alltagsaktivitäten, Verhaltensauffälligkeiten und soziale Kontakte bei Altenheimbewohnern: Wie zuverlässig sind die Beurteilungen durch das Pflegepersonal?, Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und ‐psychiatrie, 9, 167
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Metadata
- Authors
- Weyerer, S., Schäufele, M., & Hendlmeier, I.
- Affiliations
- Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Weyerer, Siegfried
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1159-1167
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2060337917
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Interreg
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Keywords
- dementia care, nursing homes, integrative care, quality of life, behavioral problems, physical restraint, psychotropic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, volunteer caregivers, social contact
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Nursing Care, Nursing Homes, Quality of Life, Residential Treatment, Social Environment, Antipsychotic Agents, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review