Cited by 47Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of special and traditional dementia care in nursing homes: results from a cross‐sectional study in Germany

Weyerer, Siegfried, Schäufele, Martina, Hendlmeier, Ingrid·2010·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Two‐thirds of all residents in nursing homes in Germany suffer from some type of dementia. We investigated whether or not dementia patients receiving special (segregated or partially segregated) care exhibited a better quality of life than their counterparts residing in traditional nursing homes. Methods: In a cross‐sectional study in 28 special dementia care facilities in the city of Hamburg (admission criterion: mobile dementia patients with behaviour problems) 594 residents were compared to a group of nursing home residents with dementia (n = 573) in 11 randomly selected nursing homes who were receiving traditional integrative care. Primary features such as cognitive and functional impairment, and behaviour problems were assessed by qualified nursing staff. Results: Controlling for confounding variables, for dementia patients in special care units as compared to a reference group in traditional integrative care, the level of volunteer caregiver involvement was higher and there was more social contact to staff, fewer physical restraints, more involvement in home activities, and more frequent use of psychiatrists. There was no significant difference between the two care settings with regard to overall use of psychotropic drugs, however, residents in special dementia care used antipsychotics significantly less often and antidepressants more often. Conclusions: Significant differences for a number of indicators of the quality of life point in favour of special dementia care. Future evaluation studies ought to examine not only the general efficacy of types of care designed especially for dementia patients but also the efficacy of the respective individual components (i.e. caregiver ratio). Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.2455

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01405.x · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00019442-200105000-00008 · DOI
  3. Beers MH, 1991, Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing homes residents, Arch Intern Med, 151, 1825, 10.1001/archinte.1991.00400090107019 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/archinte.1997.00440350031003 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1471301205051095 · DOI
  6. 10.1300/J018v11n01_03 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S104161029600261X · DOI
  8. 10.1093/geronj/44.3.M77 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03470.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1177/153331750101600506 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/153331759601100203 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01559.x · DOI
  14. Holmes D, 2000, Special Care Units, 7
  15. 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/ageing/afm108 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/00002093-199700112-00007 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/geronb/51B.1.P3 · DOI · Paper page
  19. McCann JJ, 2000, Special Care Units, 141
  20. Mahoney FI, 1965, Functional evaluation. The Barthel index, Md State Med J, 2, 61
  21. 10.2105/AJPH.90.1.92 · DOI
  22. 10.3928/0098-9134-19920301-07 · DOI
  23. Sloane PD, 1991, Physical and pharmacologic restraint of nursing home patients with dementia. Impact of specialised units, JAMA, 265, 1278, 10.1001/jama.1991.03460100080028 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02720.x · DOI
  25. Schneekloth U, 2009, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen selbständiger Lebensführung in stationären Einrichtungen (MuG IV). Demenz, Angehörige und Freiwillige, Versorgungssituation sowie Beispielen für “Good Practice”, 159
  26. Van Haitsma K, 2000, Special Care Units, 163
  27. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06856.x · DOI
  28. 10.1017/S1041610203009475 · DOI
  29. Zimber A, 1996, Alltagsaktivitäten, Verhaltensauffälligkeiten und soziale Kontakte bei Altenheimbewohnern: Wie zuverlässig sind die Beurteilungen durch das Pflegepersonal?, Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und ‐psychiatrie, 9, 167

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weyerer, S., Schäufele, M., & Hendlmeier, I.
Affiliations
Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Corresponding author
Weyerer, Siegfried
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1159-1167
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2060337917
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Interreg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
dementia care, nursing homes, integrative care, quality of life, behavioral problems, physical restraint, psychotropic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, volunteer caregivers, social contact
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Nursing Care, Nursing Homes, Quality of Life, Residential Treatment, Social Environment, Antipsychotic Agents, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review