Grief reactions in dementia carers: a systematic review
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Supporting dementia carers is an identified target of the UK government, yet we know little about such family carers' grief before and after the death of the person with dementia for whom they care. We systematically review the existing literature on characteristics, prevalence, predictors and associations of grief in dementia carers before and after death. METHODS: We searched electronic databases and found 31 publications meeting predetermined criteria. RESULTS: Grief in dementia carers, which may be normal or complicated, is a complex reaction to losses occurring before and after death. Carers experience anticipatory grief as multiple losses for themselves (companionship, personal freedom and control) and the person with dementia. Anticipation and ambiguity about the future, anger, frustration and guilt are core features. Anticipatory grief is greatest in moderate to severe stage dementia and spouse carers, especially when the person with dementia is institutionalised. There was poor quality evidence about the prevalence of grief; studies reported anticipatory grief between 47% and 71%, and complicated grief after death is estimated around 20%. Carer depression increases with anticipatory grief. Being a spouse carer and being depressed are the strongest predictors of complicated and normal grief after death. CONCLUSION: Grief in dementia carers can be expected; however, those at risk of distressing anticipatory and complicated grief may be identified and targeted for intervention when necessary. Higher quality research from a wider range of samples and countries is needed to explore this complex and emergent topic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Family caregivers often experience loss and grief while caring for PLWD, with a prevalence ranging from 47% to 71%.
“Family caregivers often experience loss and grief while caring for PLWD, with a prevalence ranging from 47% to 71%”
From The feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized controlled trial: Videoconferencing acceptance and commitment therapy in distressed family caregivers of people with dementia. (2023) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2013
Grief in family caregivers is greatest when their relatives have moderate to severe stages of dementia, and grief can increase over time due to gradual deterioration of dementia and gradual loss of selfhood in people with dementia.
“Studies found grief in family caregivers was greatest when their relatives had moderate to severe stages of dementia, and that their grief can increase over time due to gradual deterioration of dementia and gradual loss of selfhood in PLWD (Chan et al., 2013; Cheung et al., 2018).”
From The feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized controlled trial: Videoconferencing acceptance and commitment therapy in distressed family caregivers of people with dementia. (2023) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2013
Although the present study did not screen caregivers who were experiencing high levels of grief, the participants' pretest scores in grief were quite high, reflecting the high prevalence of experiencing grief while caring for people with dementia.
“Although the present study did not screen caregivers who were experiencing high levels of grief, the participants’ pretest scores in grief were quite high, reflecting the high prevalence of experiencing grief while caring for PLWD (Chan et al., 2013).”
From The feasibility and preliminary effects of a pilot randomized controlled trial: Videoconferencing acceptance and commitment therapy in distressed family caregivers of people with dementia. (2023) · cites this paper as Chan et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 243
- Authors
- Chan, D., Livingston, G., Jones, L., & Sampson, E. L.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Department of Mental Health Sciences Archway campus, Highgate Hill London N19 5NL UK
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Diana
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W1877898383
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Marie Curie (MCCC-FCO-11-U)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- grief, dementia caregivers, anticipatory grief, complicated grief, family caregivers, institutionalization, loss
- MeSH terms
- Adjustment Disorders, Attitude to Death, Death, Dementia, United Kingdom, Grief, Humans, Caregivers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review