Development of a framework for recovery in older people with mental disorder
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a conceptual framework of recovery developed for working age adults holds value for users of older people's mental health services, including those with dementia. METHOD: Thirty-eight qualitative interviews were undertaken with service users and carers from an older people's mental health service in South London and were analysed using grounded theory methods. RESULTS: Components of recovery, which appear to be meaningful to older people with mental disorder include the following: (i) the impact of illness, (ii) the significance of personal responsibility, and (iii) specific coping strategies. Unlike their younger peers, older people did not aspire to a new and revised sense of identity, nor did they seek peer support from others with lived experience of mental illness. Three components of recovery were identified as being distinct to older people: the significance of an established and enduring sense of identity; coping strategies, which provide continuity and reinforce identity; and the associated impact of physical illness. Finally, two additional components of recovery were identified for people with dementia: (i) the changing experience over time and (ii) support from others. CONCLUSION: Mental health policy is increasingly framed in terms of 'recovery'. This paper provides empirical evidence of how it applies to users of older people's mental health services. Practice implications include the need to focus on the maintenance of identity, and embed the values of empowerment, agency and self-management within service delivery.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The idea of returning to a former identity was a prominent topic throughout the literature, however, it was particularly highlighted in the definition of recovery of older adults presented by (66) "The single core category identified from the analysis was 'Continuing to be me.' This related to the permanent and established sense of identity which service user participants held [...]."
“The idea of returning to a former identity was a prominent topic throughout the literature, however, it was particularly highlighted in the definition of recovery of older adults presented by (66) “The single core category identified from the analysis was ‘Continuing to be me.’ This related to the permanent and established sense of identity which service user participants held […].””
From Recovery from Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives (2021) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 92
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ridgeway P, (2001) Re-storying Psychiatric Disability: Learning from first person narrative accounts of recovery, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 335 -343
- Authors
- Daley, S., Newton, D., Slade, M., Murray, J., & Banerjee, S.
- Affiliations
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Daley, Stephanie
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-26
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 522-529
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W1962972511
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
- Maudsley Charity
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- recovery, older adults, mental illness, dementia, service user perspectives, caregivers, coping strategies, identity, personal responsibility, physical illness, peer support, empowerment, self-management, mental health policy
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review