Cited by 92Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Psychiatry

Development of a framework for recovery in older people with mental disorder

Open access
Daley, Stephanie, Newton, David, Slade, Mike, Murray, Joanna, Banerjee, Sube·2013·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a conceptual framework of recovery developed for working age adults holds value for users of older people's mental health services, including those with dementia. METHOD: Thirty-eight qualitative interviews were undertaken with service users and carers from an older people's mental health service in South London and were analysed using grounded theory methods. RESULTS: Components of recovery, which appear to be meaningful to older people with mental disorder include the following: (i) the impact of illness, (ii) the significance of personal responsibility, and (iii) specific coping strategies. Unlike their younger peers, older people did not aspire to a new and revised sense of identity, nor did they seek peer support from others with lived experience of mental illness. Three components of recovery were identified as being distinct to older people: the significance of an established and enduring sense of identity; coping strategies, which provide continuity and reinforce identity; and the associated impact of physical illness. Finally, two additional components of recovery were identified for people with dementia: (i) the changing experience over time and (ii) support from others. CONCLUSION: Mental health policy is increasingly framed in terms of 'recovery'. This paper provides empirical evidence of how it applies to users of older people's mental health services. Practice implications include the need to focus on the maintenance of identity, and embed the values of empowerment, agency and self-management within service delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.3855

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The idea of returning to a former identity was a prominent topic throughout the literature, however, it was particularly highlighted in the definition of recovery of older adults presented by (66) "The single core category identified from the analysis was 'Continuing to be me.' This related to the permanent and established sense of identity which service user participants held [...]."

    “The idea of returning to a former identity was a prominent topic throughout the literature, however, it was particularly highlighted in the definition of recovery of older adults presented by (66) “The single core category identified from the analysis was ‘Continuing to be me.’ This related to the permanent and established sense of identity which service user participants held […].””

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 92

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ridgeway P, (2001) Re-storying Psychiatric Disability: Learning from first person narrative accounts of recovery, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 335 -343

Authors
Daley, S., Newton, D., Slade, M., Murray, J., & Banerjee, S.
Affiliations
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Daley, Stephanie
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-26
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
522-529
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1962972511
Cited by
92
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
  • Maudsley Charity
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
recovery, older adults, mental illness, dementia, service user perspectives, caregivers, coping strategies, identity, personal responsibility, physical illness, peer support, empowerment, self-management, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review